The main theme is king fish. The problems and artistic originality of the narration in the stories of V

Russian natural-philosophical prose of the second half of the 20th century: tutorial Smirnova Alfiya Islamovna

1. Plot - composition - genre, creative history ("Tsar-fish" by V.P. Astafiev)

Genre "King-fish" V. Astafieva, defined by the author himself as “narration in stories”, was interpreted in criticism in different ways: as a “hidden novel” (V. Kurbatov), ​​a kind of novel that differs in the form of narration (JL Yakimenko), a novel (N. Yanovsky), the story (N. Molchanova, R. Komina, T. Vakhitova), “such a genre education that is closest to the cycle” (N. Leiderman). About how the search for the “form” of the work was carried out, Astafiev wrote: “Friends urged me to call “Tsar Fish” a novel. Separate pieces printed in periodicals were designated as chapters from the novel. I'm afraid of this word "novel", it obliges you to a lot. But most importantly, if I were writing a novel, I would write differently. Perhaps the composition of the book would have been more harmonious, but I would have had to give up the most precious thing, from what is commonly called journalism, from free digressions, which in this form of narration do not seem to look like digressions ”(Astafiev 1976: 57).

To reveal the genre essence of "King-fish", it is necessary to understand compositional logic works, to reveal its connection with plot construction. The unity of the work is based on a system of cross-cutting motives pervading the story. The first part of the "King Fish" contrasts with the second (the principle of antithesis is used by the author in a wide and varied way), each of them is based on its own principle of construction. The chapters of the first part are closely interconnected with each other. through images(including the image of the hero-narrator), single place of action, alternating lyrical and journalistic started. Some of the chapters are “fastened” by plot links (the end of one chapter and the beginning of another), and such as “The Lady”, “At the Golden Hag”, “The Fisherman Rumbled”, “King-Fish”, the similarity of the plot “scheme” is characteristic of them a stable type of construction of the plot, associated with a purely “poaching” situation, is a collision with the fish supervision (or the expectation and fear of this meeting). In each individual case, events under similar circumstances and situations (poaching) develop differently. In the second part of the book, the chapters are fastened into a single narrative. the image of Akim. The fragmentary nature of the construction allows not to consistently present the history of Akim’s life, but only to highlight certain moments of it from a certain angle: childhood and youth (“Ear on Boganid”), work in a geological exploration team, a fight with a bear (“Commemoration”), a trip to the white mountains ("Dream of the White Mountains").

However, both parts of the work, contrasting with each other, are not isolated from each other and together form a single whole. fabulous the chapters of "King-fish" are connected mainly by the chronology of the life of the narrator (the first part of the book, the chapters "Turukhan Lily" and "There is no answer for me" from the second part) or Akim (the second part of the book). Each chapter reveals a special type of relationship between man and nature. The first one, Boye, depicts the ordeal that fell to the lot of Kolya and his partners, who went to Taimyr to hunt fox, but found themselves without a common cause. Their campaign almost ended tragically. In this chapter are born motives for retribution and salvation. The Drop chapter presents a very different type of relationship and a different way of storytelling. Communication with nature, the feeling of oneness with it allows the hero-narrator to feel happy. This chapter contrasts with the first (“Boie”). Following the “Drop”, the author placed the chapter “Not enough heart”, which, due to censorship, was not included earlier in the narrative in the stories “Tsar-fish” and was first published in 1990 as an independent story (Our contemporary. 1990. No. 8). In the chapter "Not enough heart", as in "The Drop", the voice of the hero-narrator is openly heard, but in tone this chapter is antithetical to "The Drop": instead of a lyrical tone, it is tragic. And its beginning testifies to the opposition of “light” to “dark”: “After all these amusing stories, after happy holiday given to us light the river Oparikha, just right to recall one old story, for which I will delay a little and remember the past, so that it is clearer and more visible where we lived and what we knew, and why we were so successful in moving towards what I have already told and what else remains to be told” (Astafiev 2004: 92). The title of the chapter “Not enough heart” is symbolic, since in it we are talking about escaped prisoners and about one meeting that took place in the late thirties in the taiga. The tragedy of the story of the Lame is that after all the trials that have fallen to his lot, hell will seem like paradise. This chapter, like “The Dream of the White Mountains”, is a “text within the text”, on the one hand, introducing new accents into the understanding of the main theme and enhancing the overall tone of the narration in the stories, on the other hand, its inclusion in the work is additional” confirmation” of his compositional logic and principles of organization of the artistic whole.

The following chapters after "Not enough heart" - "The Lady", "At the Golden Hag", "The Fisherman Rumbled" - are devoted to the image of poaching fish. They are arranged according to the degree of growth of the main conflict of the work, which will culminate in the chapter "King-fish". If Damka is a “junk” little man and, like other Chushans, poachers, then the Commander is already capable of committing murder for profit, although some glimpses of the human in him have been preserved. Rumbled is an extreme degree of human degradation.

In these three chapters payback motive, outlined in the first, goes into subtext. The story of Kolya's stay with his partners in Taimyr (chapter "Boye") contains an instructive meaning and one of the most important thoughts for the whole work: a person is not allowed to enter into a confrontation with nature on an equal footing, she punishes for it. Kolya and his partners frivolously overestimated their strength and paid the price for it. Finding themselves without joint work (fishing), enclosed in space huts, among alien elements, they almost lose their minds, being unable to change their fate, break the lingering silence around, interrupt the endlessly stretching, almost stopped time for them, resist the slow attenuation of their life , are close to committing a murder, but are saved by caring for their "neighbor" - sick Kolya. Through awakening in a human being, salvation comes to him. This is how it is done in the chapter salvation motive.

Lady, Rumbled and Commander - each in their own way pays for their chosen way of life: one loses his own name and acquires a dog nickname in return, the other is forced to live far from his homeland and relatives and yearn for them all his life, being deprived of the opportunity to return there; the third, the Commander, loses through the fault of the "land poacher" his beloved daughter Taika, the only creature to whom the hardened soul of the Commander "responded" best in her. In the central chapter for the whole book, "King-fish" motives for retribution and salvation receive further development and are openly realized in the fate of Ignatich, being saturated with philosophical meaning thanks to the parable underlying the chapter.

The final chapter talks about the different types of poaching. The place of the chapter "The Black Feather Flies" as the final chapter in the first part is quite natural. It is no accident that the author changed its location in a separate edition. In the magazine version, it came after the chapter "Commemoration" before "The Turukhanskaya Lily" (according to the sketchy nature of the chapter, "The Black Feather Is Flying" and "The Turukhanskaya Lily" are close to each other). In the chapter “The Black Feather Flies”, a kind of summary of the topic of poaching is summed up and a warning is given, expressed, in contrast to the chapter “Tsar-Fish”, in the form of a direct author’s appeal: “... I am afraid when people unbelt in shooting, even at the beast, on a bird, and in passing, effortlessly, shed blood. They do not know that they themselves imperceptibly cross that fatal line beyond which a person ends ... ".

The second part, which opens with the chapter "Ear on Boganid", draws a completely different type of relationship between man and nature, personified in the image of Akim's mother. Here the natural-philosophical concept of V. Astafiev gets deeper. The idea of ​​the unity of man and nature, presented in the chapter "The Drop" openly in the lyric-journalistic, philosophical segments of the text, in the chapter "Ear on Boganid" is melted down into an artistic image that embodies the ethical credo of the writer. Connections with nature dictate and determine the nature of relationships among people - this is one of the main thoughts of both the chapter of "Ear on Boganid" and the whole work.

The place of the chapter "Ear on Boganid" as the opening part of the second part of the work is not accidental. It depicts a special world of brotherhood, the basis of which is collective, commercial, artel labor. In the chapter "Ear on Boganid" found embodiment aesthetic ideal author. That is why V. Astafiev in the book “The Staff of Memory”, speaking about the history of the creation of the work, called it “the chapter on kindness” and emphasized that this chapter is the semantic center of the book (Astafiev 1980: 197). chush and Boganida - two central, opposite in their ethical essence, poles, two symbol-image associated with the principle antitheses, inherent in the whole artistic thinking of the writer and performing in the work structure-forming function.

An important place in the natural-philosophical concept of "King-fish" is occupied by the image of Akim's mother. She is not called by name, her purpose is motherhood. Mother is a child of nature and her ties with her are strong and indissoluble. It is no coincidence that the cause of the mother's death is the “exorcism potion” she drank, which kills the new life that has arisen in her and herself. The rhythm of life, determined by nature, is disrupted. This disharmony, introduced into the natural course of natural processes, leads to the death of the mother.

The second chapter of the second part - "Commemoration" - depicts a new stage in Akim's biography: work in a geological exploration team, a fight with a bear, which in the context of the work is filled with special meaning. Akim withstood the trials that befell Kolya ("Boye") and Ignatich ("Tsar-fish"). The scene of Akim's fight with the bear that killed Petrunya contrasts with the picture of the fight between a man and a king-fish. Antithesis in the image of a person’s collision with the forces of nature, he also finds a compositional solution: in the arrangement of the chapters “Tsar-fish” and “Commemoration” "mirror" principle - they are located symmetrically in relation to each other The chapter "King-fish" takes the second place from the end of the first part, the chapter "Commemoration" - follows the second from the beginning of the second part. The implementation of the antithesis is also facilitated by the cult - in the context of the myth - origin of the images of the king-fish and the bear - the "master of the taiga". These opponents are "exceptional", worthy of each other.

The next chapter - "The Turukhansk Lily" - occupies a central place in the second part of the book, standing out in it by the fact that in the chapter, as in the first part, the hero-narrator is the main character, Akim fades into the background, the journalistic beginning prevails in it . The title of the chapter is symbolic in the context of revealing the theme of nature. Turukhansk lily, saranka, embodies organicity and naturalness, inherent only in natural phenomena. The chapter "The Turukhanskaya Lily" is thematically, in plot construction and style close to the chapter "The Drop" (the first part). And they are located symmetrically each other. If we consider the final chapter “There is no answer for me” as a kind of epilogue to the whole work, then the second chapter “Drop” and the eleventh “Turukhan Lily” constitute a kind of composite frame inside the book. Therefore, the “Dream of the White Mountains” (a finished work within the narrative) is “carried out” by the author outside this frame.

The main motives of the work in the penultimate chapter receive their logical conclusion. The chapter "The Dream of the White Mountains" is final. It “resonates” with the first chapter of Boye: the similarity of situations (isolation from the human world in the natural elements), the identity of the embodiment of the chronotope, the completion motives for retribution, salvation, which began in the chapter "Boie". Akim and Elya, like other heroes of the work, are "tested" by those forces of nature over which man has no power. The climax in the construction of the plot of the chapter is the image of their attempt to get out of the snow captivity. Their path to salvation, which has become the road to people, ends happily. So embodied in the chapter salvation motive.

Gets completed in the chapter "Dream of the White Mountains" and payback motive, revealing on the fate of Goga Gertsev. It seems to be quite legitimate to speak of this chapter as a “work within a work”, since many artistic realities, presented fragmentarily in chapters-stories, found a more complete “interpretation” in it.

Critics have already written about the “conscious” internal connection of the chapter “The Dream of the White Mountains” with M. Lermontov’s “Hero of Our Time” (See: Marchenko 1977), reminiscences from which are contained in Gertsev’s diary and in his characterization in the work. The comparison of Goga with Pechorin serves satirical purposes, revealing the pretentiousness and borrowing of Hertsev's philosophy. His accidental death in the taiga pay, which inevitably had to overtake Goga. He despises people. Akim is a "stinker" for him. Family ties with parents, his own child do not matter to him. He is also untenable in love, treating women (the librarian Lyudochka, Elya) consumeristically.

Based on the relationship between the chapters "Boye" and "The Dream of the White Mountains", we can talk about the circular completeness of the plot of the work, or about the following, second composite frame, framing the previous one. Interconnected in "Tsar-fish" exposition and epilogue(chapter "There is no answer for me"), which make up third composite frame. In the exposition and the epilogue, the author's voice is openly heard, thanks to which the narrative is saturated with lyrical and philosophical sound. The exposition deals with the arrival of the hero-narrator in Siberia. Previously, he “had been on the Yenisei” more than once (after this exposition, the description of the journey through Siberia, along the Yenisei and its tributaries begins), in the epilogue, the hero-narrator leaves Siberia and surveys it from the airplane window, seeing the changes that have taken place, comparing past and present. In the context of the epilogue, the epigraph to the chapter is important (“Never return anything ...

You can return to the same places, but it’s impossible to go back”), which in meaning echoes the words from Ecclesiastes that conclude the chapter: “Everything has its hour and time for every work under heaven ...”.

The presence in the work of V. Astafiev triple composite frame indicates that he successfully uses the traditional literary device framing. The triple compositional frame is an important proof that we are not dealing with a cycle of stories, and not even with two relatively independent parts within the narrative, where the chapter “The Dream of the White Mountains” stands apart, but with a work that is a single artistic whole. The author strove to achieve this integrity by further refining the "Tsar-fish" (changing the location of individual chapters and dividing it into two parts, which was absent in the first - magazine - edition). And even the inclusion in the text of a new chapter (“There is not enough heart”) only testifies to the “mobility” of the fragmentary form, but not to the fact that, “freely organized”, it can “expand” indefinitely. As for structures narration in stories, then the inclusion of a new chapter only “completed” the process of “harmonization” of the text: the parable chapter “King-fish” occupied in its structure central position, becoming the seventh (out of thirteen).

The genre definition of "narrative in stories" points to novelistic type of construction works, but the mechanism for juxtaposing “stories” has an important feature: all chapters are clearly “fixed” relative to each other, arranged in such a way that the author’s concept of natural philosophy receives its most complete, polysemantic artistic embodiment. United in one work in a certain subordination, these "fragments" constitute unity of the highest order. The novelistic type of construction of the narrative fully justifies itself. It seems that the writer found, if not a new, but with great artistic potential, a form that made it possible to realize the author's need for a lengthy, unhurried presentation of the "journey", which absorbed dissimilar material. The same “free” form made it possible to cut off all the secondary, burdensome narrative, to include chapters with different genre dominants (lyrical and philosophical story, journalistic essay, parable, story). However, it also obliged the author to consistently maintain the logic of the narrative, to carefully think through architectonics and composition works. And this reveals the originality of V. Astafiev's genre thinking, creatively rethinking the form of "short story" narration, traditional for world literature. The unity and integrity of "King-fish" are created thanks to the images of the hero-narrator and Akim, through the structure-forming motifs of salvation and retribution, the rhythmic organization of the composition, and the annular closure of the plot.

To understand the poetics of "King-fish" is important creative history a work that clarifies issues related to the structure of the text. In the process of analyzing the narrative in the stories, we touched on some moments of this story, structural transformations of the text. Let us dwell in more detail on the very process of creating and finalizing the work after its first publication.

N.K. Piksanov wrote: “We are usually content with studying major works in their final, crystallized form. Meanwhile, understanding the results of the process without studying the process itself is discredited for the historian in advance: only the study of the entire history of phenomena provides a complete understanding of it” (Piksanov 1971: 15). The researcher examines the question creative history works not only as one of the moments in the diversified study of the writer’s work, but also as a special scientific problem of “great fundamental importance” (Piksanov 1971: 7), complaining that insufficient attention is paid to the study of the creative history of the work in literary science.

V. Astafiev is one of those writers who are not satisfied with what they have written once and after years again return to their creation, finalizing it. The story "The Shepherd and the Shepherdess" was subjected to especially careful editing, he "rewrote" it five times. “A worthy writer,” according to the writer in the book The Staff of Memory, “will always find something to remake, for there is no limit to perfection” (Astafiev 1980: 174). It is interesting to compare the first, magazine, publication of "Tsar-Fish" ("Our Contemporary". 1976. No. 4-6) and subsequent ones, of which we will focus on the publication of the work in the first collected works of V.P. Astafieva (Astafiev V. Sobr. cit.: In 4 vols. T. 4. M., 1981). When comparing the two versions of "Tsar-fish", attention is drawn to those changes that are caused by the desire to introduce as much as possible, in the words of V. Astafiev, "writing discipline" into the artistic, in particular compositional, book structure. In a separate edition, the narrative was supplemented with a new chapter "Lady" (withdrawn from the magazine for censorship reasons) and acquired a two-part composition. Some chapters have been changed. The chapter "The Black Feather Flies", which was located in the magazine version after the chapter "Commemoration", moved, taking its place after the chapter "King-fish", thus becoming the final chapter of the first part. Here is how the construction of the work looks like in a magazine and a separate edition:

Journal publication

(Our contemporary. 1976. No. 4–6)

At the golden hag

Rybak Rumbled

king fish

Ear on Boganid

black feather flying

Tour u ha ne ka ya lily|

Dream of white mountains

I don't have an answer

standalone edition

(Collected works: In 4 vols. Vol. 4).

Part I

At the golden hag

Rybak Rumbled

king fish

black feather flying

Part II

Ear on Boganid

Tour ear not ka ya lily

Dream of white mountains

I don't have an answer

For a holistic perception of the work, the very idea of ​​dividing it into two parts is fruitful - the combination of chapters-stories into parts within the whole confirms the idea that we are not dealing with a collection of stories, not with disparate stories and short stories, united only by a common theme, title and image hero-narrator, but with a complete artistic phenomenon. At the heart of this phenomenon lies the ordered subordination of chapters, internal compositional logic. The inclusion in the book of a new chapter "The Lady" and its place in the artistic structure of the work, as well as partial changes in the architectonics, are motivated by considerations of an ideological and aesthetic order.

Work on the "Tsar Fish" was not limited to just rearranging the chapters. It has a multifaceted character and is conducted at different levels: compositional, semantic, stylistic, syntactic, morphological, phonetic. Almost every page or piece of text bears the stamp of the author's revision, multi-purpose in its focus. Let's consider various aspects of creative development (and often - and processing) of the work by V. Astafiev.

Composition Perfection The “King-Fish” manifests itself not only on the scale of the entire book, but also on local segments of the text, within one chapter or even compositional form (description, narration, dialogue, etc.). Particularly large editing, reflecting the writer's desire to strengthen the logic and chronological sequence of the narrative, was subjected to the chapter "The Dream of the White Mountains". The nature of its revision can be judged by a large excerpt, which in the journal version was a continuous text and had a different structure. In a separate edition, this passage is divided into three parts, and some paragraphs are reversed.

Chronological coordinates "fix" the development of the plot in the chapter. Here is the beginning of each of the three sections highlighted by the writer:

1. "Full, quiet autumn lay in the taiga." Next comes the editing of the first major passage (the first section) (Astafiev 1981: 315).

2. “The day became shorter and shorter, and the sooner it became shorter, the denser it became for the hunter” - editing the second section (Astafiev 1981: 317).

3. “In the morning it crunched, sparkled around the charym - autumn crust” - this is followed by editing the third section (Astafiev 1981: 318).

The most significant changes are contained in the first section, devoted to the preparation of Akim for leaving the winter hut. He makes reserves for the winter, each action of Akim, the sequence of actions, is full of special meaning and significance. While finalizing the text, the author draws with the utmost scrupulousness the thoroughness with which Akim prepares for the campaign, conveys the smallest details of the life of the winterers, the difficulties that they have to overcome.

Astafiev not only moves individual paragraphs, but also reworks them. Speaking about the taste of bird meat that Akim ate, the author notes in a magazine version: “The birds ate not only berries, but also kidneys, an alder cone, and the smell of a rotting, mossy tree did not leave Akim even at night, it made him feel sick in his stomach, sucked in his chest, and he tried to save himself with berries and nuts” (Astafiev 1976: 6, 32). In the book version, a clarification is made: “The upland bird switched from berries to a kidney and an alder cone”, since it is already late autumn in the taiga, snow has fallen.

In some cases, editing is accompanied by the inclusion of inserts. When changing the composition of a large fragment of text, the author had to maintain the internal correlation of paragraphs from different sections, since already written pieces of text served as “building material”. Here is one such example taken from the first section:

Journal publication

"At the time when Ende

swiftly

rolled down the slush,

soldering in front of your eyes

banks of the river,

erasing her curve

strip from the ground, as if

handwriting from a notebook

student rubber.

Akim shirkap puchkovy

pipoy firewood and before

shirked. that epya

once said…”

(Astafiev 1976: 6. 33).

standalone edition

"At the time when Ende

swiftly

rolled down the slush,

soldering in front of your eyes

banks of the river,

erasing her curve

a strip of land

handwriting from a notebook

student rubber.

Elya was between

life and death, and

stocks were to be made

lack of time But as soon as

she recovered a little

and you can leave her

in a hut for a couple with Rozka ... "

(Astafiev 1981: 316).

In the magazine version, the present tense of the events depicted is interrupted by the past tense, the author returns to the episode that was in the past, as indicated by the words: “At that time ...”, and suddenly the past tense just as unexpectedly merges with the present time of Akim and Eli’s stay in the winter hut . It is important for V. Astafiev to keep subsequence in the very course of time, without disturbing its course when describing the pastime of winterers, as Eli’s gradual improvement in health, Akim’s daily preparation for the journey, changes in nature (“The day became shorter and shorter”, “the ice on the End is unreliable”) are depicted. Thus, the sequence of the movement of time, its continuity in depicting the life of heroes for the writer is of particular importance. The episode with the saw, he returns from the past to the present, consistently developing time for heroes.

The past tense appears in the narrative (in the book version) already in connection with the memory of Eli's illness. And here the author adds a few lines: “Elya was between life and death and there was no time to make supplies, but as soon as she recovered a little.” Everything falls into place. Editing facilitates the reader's perception of the work. This "everyday" episode (Akim sawing firewood, irritating Eli with the sound of a saw) conveys the inner changes that take place in Elya's soul. The writer seeks to condense the narrative, "pull" it into a single knot in which all everyday and psychological details are closely "fitted" to each other, interconnected and interdependent.

Editing the magazine version contributes to a deeper understanding of both the characters of the characters and the author's attitude towards them. This applies primarily to the image of Eli. Already moving the piece of text in question somehow softens it. In the magazine version, two episodes depicting Eli's nervous irritation were located side by side - one followed the other (the first - Elya is annoyed by the sound of a saw, the second - Elya squeamishly knocks a mug with a decoction of grass out of Akim's hands). In a separate edition, these episodes are separated from each other, which indicates the refinement of the psychological appearance of Eli and somewhat softens the author's assessment of the heroine.

Improving the text, V. Astafiev seeks to strengthen authenticity depicted, which is connected with the very essence of the writer's creative method, in which the journalistic way of reflecting the world plays an essential role. This is clearly visible, in particular, on that one - very significant! - processing (precisely compositional), which was subjected to another large fragment of the "Dream of the White Mountains", dedicated to the diaries of Goga Gertsev, which begins in the journal with the question: "Why, why did they beckon Elya and Akim to them?" The compositional rearrangement inside it is motivated by the fact that in the original version, Eli's insight is unnecessarily accelerated, lightened and premature: Elya wants to understand what happened, what she experienced, and right there - literally in a few lines! - the answer was found, in fact, a sentence to oneself, which is pronounced "without regret, and even without grief, with disarming surprise." In order to avoid simplifying the character of Eli and at the same time simplifying the main conflict of the chapter, to achieve the utmost psychological authenticity, V. Astafiev, compiling a fragment of the text compositionally, reproduces events as they should have happened in life itself, in accordance with the logic of the characters’ behavior, the logic of the development of their characters .

In the book version, the story about the diaries of Goga Gertsev begins with Elya listening to them in Akim’s reading for long evenings: -gornushki, in a hut tidied up from all sides squeezed by taiga and darkness, Elya listened to Gertsev's diaries, trying to understand something, albeit belatedly, to figure out what and why happened to her ”(Astafiev 1981: 329). Further, the diaries themselves are characterized, and then the question is quite justified: why, why did Gertsev's diaries beckon to themselves? After all, he "always kept his morals in sight." Eli's confession of his own mistakes is missing here. Everything is much more difficult for her. In order to understand herself, to understand (at least now!) Gog, with whom she so recklessly embarked on an unknown path that became his last, she needed to get to know the owner of the diaries better, to understand the way of thinking and the philosophy that Gertsev professed, to find out life goals. After a different Goga appeared in the diaries compared to how she knew him, Eli's confession - "I messed up something in my life ..." - sounds almost tragic. And it is pronounced Elei quite differently. Before us is the path of mistakes that she walked. Thanks to the meeting with Akim, acquaintance with Gertsev's diaries, the situation (on the verge of death) in which she found herself, Elya understands the falsity of this path, evaluates it from the standpoint of an adult who has finally realized responsibility for his actions. And this is a visible result, the result of Eli's growing up, a step on the way to her spiritual insight.

The compositional editing of some passages of the text is most often dictated by the writer’s need to reveal the logic of the narrative within each passage, to streamline the system of artistic “coordinates”, in particular, time (“The Dream of the White Mountains”), to give greater concreteness, plasticity and emotional expressiveness to images, drama and dynamism to situations . Achieve maximum psychological credibility of characters and circumstances.

Many changes in the journal text "Tsar Fish" are associated with the introduction of new material into the artistic fabric of the work, enriching the content of the book, expanding the boundaries of the narrative. This trend of meaning "saturation" text is implemented in a system of inserts, different in volume and nature. There are small inserts introduced for the purpose of explanation or clarification. In the magazine edition in the chapter “Boie” it is said about the lemming without any explanation, and in the book edition an explanation is given: “... That is the scientific name of the pied mouse - the smallest and most evil animal in the north; for all living things in the tundra, pied beetle is food ... ”(Astafiev 1981: 22).

And here is an example of a different kind from the chapter "At the golden hag." A small insert was made after the words that the Chushans perceive all laws with cunning: “... if the law protects from adversity, helps to strengthen financially, snatch for drinking, they willingly accept it”, but if it infringes them in some way, they pretend to be orphans . “Well, if they already pin it to the wall and don’t get out,” continues V. Astafiev in a separate publication, “a silent, long siege begins, with starvation, quiet glanders, the Chushan people achieve their goal: what needs to be bypassed - they will bypass, what they want to get - they will get who they need survive from the village - they will survive ”... (Astafiev 1981: 89). This is an important additional touch in the collective image of the Chushan, which characterizes his socio-psychological appearance.

Significant changes have been made to the Fisherman Grohotalo chapter. Recreating the past of this poacher, V. Astafiev seeks to tell about the events that took place in reality with maximum reliability. The introduction of additional details of Grokhotalo's biography concretizes his image, explains how the native of Ukraine ended up in the North and why he did not go on vacation to his homeland, which he yearned for (in the magazine version, this remained unclear, how the measure and degree of Grokhotalo's guilt was not entirely clear).

New details and facts included in the text of the work are accompanied by its additional processing. The part of the chapter that tells about the end of this ill-fated for Grokhotalo and tragic for the Commander (his daughter died) day is also being reworked. V. Astafiev added a capacious detail, which again serves to concretize the moral image of the Chushan people. When the Commander was looking for the killer of his daughter, and Grokhotalo was destroying home belongings, “some kayakers were drowning on the Yenisei” (Astafiev 1981: 121). This message fills the passage under consideration with new content, deepens the author's assessment of what is depicted. In the book version of "King-Fish", in accordance with the genre setting, the journalistic "stream" is intensified, helping to more clearly identify the author's position. This is typical, in particular, for the chapter "The Black Feather Flies". The magazine editorial said that fashionistas adapted swan down for outfits, "especially for winter muffs." In a separate edition, the author, without limiting himself to stating a fact, gives him a journalistic assessment (See: Astafiev 1981: 165).

In a separate edition, in a modified form compared to the journal publication, the final chapter also appeared. The author “finishes” it, stating the facts of mismanagement and slovenliness with documentary accuracy. In the year of the mass destruction of birds on the Siberian River Sym, which is described in the chapter, the procurement office accepted capercaillie for three rubles apiece, then for a ruble, then it stopped accepting altogether: there was no refrigerator, it was warm and drizzling, planes stopped flying.

The bird has sniffed in the warehouse. The stench floated throughout the village, the “goods” were written off, the losses were attributed to the elements, they hung a tidy sum on the neck of the state, and the capercaillie were loaded with dung forks into the bodies of cars and taken to a local pond, to a landfill” (Astafiev 1981: 172).

In the chapter “The Black Pen Flies”, the artistic and journalistic beginning is presented most vividly, therefore the “new” finale fits into the content of the chapter and sums it up, since it deals with the consequences of the “battle” of capercaillie in the fall of 1971.

“All winter and spring, crows, magpies, dogs, cats feasted; and as the wind rose, soot flew over the village of Chush a black feather raised from the banks big pond, flew, circled, covering the white light, rippling with burnt gunpowder and dead dust on the face of the crazy sun ”(Astafiev 1981: 172). This ending also explains the title of the chapter - "The Black Feather Flies".

Sometimes the inserts grow to entire pages, on which individual episodes, human destinies are detailed and concretized (the images of the "absent-minded poet" and Tikhon Pupkov from the chapter "The Dream of the White Mountains"), which helps the writer to reproduce a wide historical background, or to describe the moral character of which - a social group. In this regard, the fate of Paramon Paramonovich Olsufiev, Akim's mentor, a man who spent his whole life on the river (“Ukha on Boganid”), is indicative. In the magazine version of the work, it was said that the steamer "Trouble" was handed over for scrap. What happened to Paramon Paramonovich, the “biggest head of the travel situation” on the Bedovoi, remained unclear to the reader. In a separate edition, the author gives a biography of his hero, clarifying the historical realities. Olsufiev had a hard time parting with "Bedov" - he "had a stroke." After recuperating in the hospital, he sold sailor's ammunition for a pittance and went with his wife to Kazakhstan to the "heroic virgin lands" in order to start a new, "overland" life there.

The creative process of V. Astafiev is characterized by the desire to give psychological "full-bloodedness" to each, even episodic character, of which there are many in the narrative. An example of this kind of refinement is the story about paper wads (chapter "Commemoration"), which the writer needed in order to reproduce the course of the investigation itself, to strengthen the reliability of its presentation, to reveal the psychological detail of Petrun's appearance. The ending of the chapter "Commemoration" has also been changed, incorporating a lengthy insert, necessary for concretizing the life of a geological exploration team. If in the magazine version there were only two words about the fact that after the commemoration for Petrun "they went to work at the appointed time", then in a separate edition a detailed picture of the arrival of the party leader by plane in the detachment is drawn, replete with colorful household and production details.

The chapter "Dream of the White Mountains" has undergone a significant revision in the same direction. In the story of Eli's life in Moscow in the house of his mother, the editor of the publishing house, the author adds two inserts that describe the life of the creative intelligentsia (the first insert is about the poet who visited their house and about his "transformation", the second about Tikhon Pupkov). The author recreates a portrait of episodic characters with a few strokes, reveals the development of character. In the chapter "Dream of the White Mountains" there is an unusual insert - a poem included in the diary of Goga Gertsev. It's small poetic work about the fate of a lion who suffered from a bullet in his childhood, who grew up and lived his whole life in captivity, but yearns for freedom. It organically fits into the context not only of Gertsev's diary, but of the entire work.

"Tsar-fish" is a philosophical work. The chapter “Drop” is permeated with philosophical reflections, the chapter “Dream of the White Mountains” is saturated with philosophical overtones. Her heroes - Akim and Elya - find themselves in an unusual situation for themselves - they are isolated from the whole world around them, their space is limited by the hut, and behind the hut begins the element that is beyond their control, but on which they are dependent. For them, the concepts of "life - death" appear in all their nakedness. One has only to stop resisting, stop fighting for life, as death will come. This is the reality they face daily. In this situation, thoughts arise about the value of human life, about its meaning, embodied in the insert included in the book version. It begins with the question, did it become easier for people from the fact that they learned that there is no immortality?

The finale of the work has also been revised. Apparently the author used different translations Ecclesiastes. In a separate edition, the antithetical nature of the provisions of Ecclesiastes is more clearly presented, which is generally inherent in the figurative system and compositional structure of Astafiev's work.

Using a system of inserts, V. Astafiev significantly expands the spatio-temporal framework of the narrative, enriches and saturates it with additional artistic material of a socio-historical, psychological and everyday nature. An insert-explanation (clarification), an insert-description, an insert-characteristic, an insert-assessment allow the author to create a wide panorama of reality, which in the magazine version looked more localized and aesthetically less multidimensional.

An important place in the work on the work is occupied by the tendency to thickening the story, indicating an increase in the "specific weight" of the word, its semantic load. It manifests itself in two ways: firstly, in simplifying the construction of the proposal, and secondly, in saving language tools. Improving the stylistic “shell” of the text, V. Astafiev removes words and phrases from the work that do not carry new or aesthetically rich information, simplifies the syntactic structure of sentences, bringing the language of the work closer to colloquial speech, removing, in particular, inversions.

The tendency to condense the narrative was manifested in the removal of individual fragments of the text, most often insignificant in volume. Perhaps the biggest exception is the removal from the magazine text of the former finale of the chapter "King-fish". The magazine version at the end of the chapter tells about the rescue of Ignatich, to whose aid his brother Commander came. In the book version, the final chapter appeared in a truncated form. “Go, fish, go! Live as long as you can! I won't tell anyone about you!" - said the catcher, and he felt better. The body - because the fish did not pull down, did not hang on it like a stoop, the soul - from some liberation not yet comprehended by the mind ”(Astafiev 1981: 155). The crisis situation of confrontation between man and nature (the image of the fish acts as its symbol) chosen by V. Astafiev helps to artistically realize the moral and philosophical meaning of the parable. The writer persistently strives to give it a generalizing, symbolic character, as evidenced by the completion of the chapter. The "new" ending is open-ended and does not answer the question of whether Ignatich will be saved. In this form, it is more in line with the parable nature of the chapter.

trend towards language savings expressed in the fact that the writer eliminates turns, phrases, words that carry "excessive" information. Of the two synonymous words, in some cases the author leaves one. He replaces complex verb forms with simple ones, removes unnecessary words naming the actions of heroes in those cases when it is clear from the context that the hero will do this. V. Astafiev also crosses out the words that "slow down" the statement, bringing the language of the work closer to the colloquial one, giving the text dynamism and expression. In the book version, the author tends not to use plug-in constructions, changes the construction of the sentence from participle turnover, placing it after the word being defined.

There are many examples of this kind. In the linguistic structure of the entire work, an orientation towards live colloquial speech is manifested. It is no coincidence that criticism immediately drew attention to this feature of Astafiev's narrative. “... All this is from an oral tale,” Gleb Goryshin noted (Literaturnoe obozreniye 1976: 10, 52).

The book version takes into account critical remarks about the author's abuse of vulgarisms and dialectisms. Some dialectisms are deciphered, hunting and fishing terms are explained, argotisms and vulgarisms are replaced by understandable colloquial words. The phonetic texture of the speech of Akim and other characters is specified.

The process of the writer's work on the "Tsar Fish" is much more multifaceted and immeasurably richer than those summarized observations that are presented here. But the above facts also make it possible to judge that irresistible thirst for perfection, high demands on oneself and the writer's immense responsibility to his reader, which serve as the breeding ground for V. Astafiev's works.

From the book Away from Reality: Studies in the Philosophy of Text author Rudnev Vadim Petrovich

Chapter 2 Plot

From the book Osho Library: Traveler's Parables author Rajneesh Bhagwan Shri

Fish and the Ocean Once upon a time there was a fish, a simple fish. One day, having heard a lot of enthusiastic stories about the Ocean, she decided that she must get there, no matter what it costs her. The fish went to various wise men. Many of them had nothing to say, but they made all sorts of nonsense in order to look

From the book Postmodernism [Encyclopedia] author Gritsanov Alexander Alekseevich

PLOT PLOT is a way of organizing a classically understood work, modeled in which the eventfulness is built linearly, i.e. unfolds from the past through the present to the future (with possible retrospectives) and is characterized by the presence of immanent logic,

From the book of Parmenides the author Plato

COMPOSITION OF THE DIALOGUE I. Introduction The story of the persons associated with this dialogue, which is a presentation by a certain Kefal of a long-standing conversation between the famous Eleans - Narmenides and Zeno - with the then young Socrates.II. The main Eleatic thesisAll is one, and not

From the book If you are not a donkey, or How to recognize a Sufi. Sufi jokes author Konstantinov S.V.

Water and Fish Did you know that fish have no idea about water? She does not know about the existence of water while she is in it. And only once on land, she begins to worry, but still does not understand her misfortune. Cast ashore, she lies, convulsively

From the book Dialogues Memories Reflections author Stravinsky Igor Fyodorovich

Composition About the process of composing R. K. When did you realize your vocation as a composer? S. I don't remember when and how I first felt like a composer. Remember) only that such an idea arose in my early childhood, long before any serious musical

From the book Favorites. Myth logic author Golosovker Yakov Emmanuilovich

6. Genre as interesting Under the heading "interesting subject" one can also consider the genre: for example, adventure novel as a genre. But the genre can figure as an object of aesthetics only insofar as poetics will be considered as part of aesthetics. Isn't it slovenliness

From the book Inexperienced Wise by Wei Wu Wei

5. Fish - I am the Mind in which the world appears, - the owl said to the rabbit - Really? - answered the rabbit, plucking a juicy dandelion and tugging at it with the corner of his mouth. “That thought never crossed my mind.” “So it is,” continued the owl, “and thoughts are not fish to be caught by animals or

From the book Mental Illness and Personality author Foucault Michel

"Mental Illness and Personality": the plot The work "Mental Illness and Personality" can rightfully be called both scientific work and literary work: brilliant style, lulling duration, transporting the reader from period to period, at first reassuring and then

From the book Results of Millennium Development, Vol. I-II author Losev Alexey Fyodorovich

2. The main plot of the extant work In the first two books, which, as it is said, form the introduction, the following is told.

From the book Answers: On Ethics, Art, Politics and Economics by Rand Ayn

1. Composition Strictly speaking, it is rather difficult to establish an exact composition in such a diverse text. Nevertheless, at least thematically, one can still imagine the plan of this treatise, and, moreover, in the following form.

From the book Russian Natural Philosophical Prose of the Second Half of the 20th Century: Study Guide author Smirnova Alfiya Islamovna

From the book Pearls of Wisdom: parables, stories, instructions author Evtikhov Oleg Vladimirovich

2. Natural-philosophical "manifesto" by V. Astafiev (narration in the stories "Tsar-fish") Viktor Astafiev, whose thought is constantly focused on the "pain points" of time, turned to the problem of the relationship between man and nature already at an early stage of his creative work.

From the book Comparative Theology. Book 6 author Team of authors

DRIED FISH Huang Tzu was born into a poor family, and often there was not enough food in the house. One day, his parents sent him to borrow some rice from the rich man. “Of course I can help,” the rich man replied. “Soon I will collect taxes from my village and then I can lend you at least fifty coins.”

From the book Architecture and Iconography. "The body of the symbol" in the mirror of classical methodology author Vaneyan Stepan S.

From the author's book

Centric building as an architectural genre This is what concerns the basilica. Reasoning about the centric type differs in a completely different logic. This type of church is rooted in the "genre" of "high-class and sophisticated pavilions", conceived as intended for small,

The writing

In the story "King-fish", from my point of view, a very complex and important psychological question is raised, which consists in the relationship between the individual and society. In the role of the first here is Ignatich, and in the role of the second - the inhabitants of his native village of Chush. Ignatich is a jack of all trades, ready to help anyone and not demanding anything for it, a good owner, a skilled mechanic, and a true fisherman. But this is not the main thing in it. The main thing in Ignatich is his attitude towards the rest of the Chushan people with a certain amount of condescension and superiority. It is this indulgence and superiority, though not displayed by him, that forms the gulf between them. From the outside, it looks as if Ignatich is one step higher than his fellow countrymen.
I would especially like to emphasize how the author himself says about Ignatich: "He was from here - a Siberian and by nature herself was accustomed to honor the "optism", to reckon with him, not to annoy him, but at the same time do not break his hat too much, or, as it is explained here , - on giving yourself an ax to drop on your feet. It is this one sentence, in my opinion, that contains the whole point of the story. It is necessary to understand the character of Ignatich consistently. Strict, unambiguous labels "negative" or "positive" hero are by no means applicable to him.
And so, the first thought when reading the story is "Ignatich's character is very contradictory." Yes, this is true, but this is easily explained by his independence. Yes, it's independence. It seems to me that Ignatich, in his childhood just Zinka, grew up relying only on himself. He did not want to ask for help from others, believing that he could achieve everything himself. And indeed, he achieved everything on his own, but only while growing up, he became so distant from the society in which he lived that, having achieved everything, he remained on his own.
In my opinion, while he was growing up, his own little world with its own orders and laws was formed in his soul. In addition, helping other people seemingly disinterestedly, Ignatich actually developed in them a special attitude towards his personality. At first it was not noticeable, but as soon as Ignatich confidently got on his feet, he declared his position in society. Most likely, he thought this: "I do everything that you need and how you need it, but I also don’t take anything for it, so don’t touch me and don’t teach me how to live." All this was aggravated by the habit of silent communication acquired by Ignatich, the one that so repelled people from him.
Rising to his feet, Ignatich involuntarily stands above the society, which he helped all the time. This is explained by the fact that everyone, most likely, owes him something, since once in his time he helped them with something. Thus, a certain psychological terror of Ignatich is explained, which consists in clean clothes, a good house, and a brilliant ability to fish. He puts this pressure on the entire village. That is, in fact, the definition given by the author himself of the relationship between "optism" and Ignatich is refuted. In fact, he does not honor him, does not consider him, and constantly annoys him with his behavior.
Having shown this, making it clear to the reader: who Ignatich really is, the author proceeds to carry out punishment for his hero. This punishment appeared to him in the form of a king-fish, about which he learned a lot from his grandfather, a fisherman. Relying, as always, only on his own strength, this time Ignatich paid dearly. This rash decision almost cost him his life. But while he was in the water with this fish, he seemed to me to have changed a lot. The thing is that for the first time he truly asked everyone for forgiveness, almost without owning his mouth, but still hoping that at least someone would hear him. And only after asking for forgiveness, he felt in his soul some kind of special liberation, not yet comprehended by the mind.
Only now, in my opinion, and begins real life fisherman Ignatich, and not the pathetic likeness that he led before meeting with the king-fish.

Other writings on this work

"Tsar-fish" Astafiev Mastery of the image of nature in one of the works of Russian literature of the XX century. (V.P. Astafiev. "King-fish".) REVIEW OF THE WORK OF V. P. ASTAFYEV "KING-FISH" The role of artistic detail in one of the works of Russian literature of the XX century. (V.P. Astafiev "Tsar-fish") The theme of protection of nature in modern prose (V. Astafiev, V. Rasputin) The statement of universal moral values ​​in the book by V.P. Astafiev "King fish" Man and the biosphere (According to the work of V.P. Astafiev "Tsar-fish") Nature (based on the work of V.P. Astafiev "King-fish") The image of Ignatich in the short story "Tsar-fish" The tragedy of man and nature in the work of Astafiev "Tsar-fish" Characteristics of the story "Tsar-fish" Environmental and moral issues The main theme of Astafiev's book "King Fish" REVIEW OF THE WORK OF V. P. ASTAFYEV "KING-FISH" - option 2 My reflections on the pages of Astafiev's story "Tsar-fish" The history of writing Astafiev's work "Tsar-fish" Man and nature, their unity Morality and ecology based on the work of Viktor Astafiev "King fish" Real and fantastic in the work of Astafiev Tsar fish Composition based on the novelistic cycle of Astafiev "Tsar-fish"

Students get acquainted with the work of Astafiev “Tsar-fish” at literature lessons in grade 11. Its problems are especially relevant for their environmental orientation. In the story “King-fish”, it is advisable to start the analysis of the artistic and semantic content with the history of creation and acquaintance with the worldviews of the author. Only after getting acquainted with the personality of the writer and his literary principles, it is possible to carry out a complete analysis of the work, which you can get acquainted with in our article.

Brief analysis

Year of writing-1976 year.

History of creation- hard painstaking work to implement the author's intention about the barbaric attitude of man to nature and his moral responsibility to it.

Subject- the responsibility of man to nature, the consumer attitude to the surrounding living world and the moral devastation of man.

Composition– ring composition, classical three-part structure.

Genre- storytelling.

Direction- realism.

History of creation

The meaning of the name the story, which is the key in the cycle of the same name, is gradually revealed in the plot of the work. The protagonist finds himself in a situation where he himself becomes a victim of his craft. This is a well-deserved fate for someone who has been plundering mother nature for many years, but an exhausted person does not want to become food for fish and turns to God. In the memory of Ignatich, the words of his grandfather come up, who warned that a meeting with the king-fish could turn into trouble if the fisherman's conscience was unclean. It is a huge silent, but definitely intelligent creature that makes a person reconsider his life and repent.

In the old days, the sturgeon was called nothing more than the "king-fish", just like the eagle - the king of birds. It was this word that Viktor Astafiev resurrected in his work. The king fish is a symbol of the greatness and intelligence of nature, which is much stronger than a man. The image of a "prehistoric" creature reminds the reader that he is only a small part of the vast, vast, eternal force of nature.

Working on a cycle of stories, finding the right form was not easy for the writer. Huge responsibility to yourself, a large amount of material, important points, which could not be overlooked - all this made the creative process titanic complex.

Subject

Astafiev reveals the theme of the relationship of man with nature, man and society. The consumer attitude of people to the world around them has become the main problem of the twentieth century. Man takes more from nature than he needs. This could turn into a terrible tragedy.

The protagonist of the story, Zinovy ​​Ignatich, feels himself in his native village to be the master and rightful owner of all the riches of nature. Poaching has long ceased to be something shameful for the villagers - this is their ordinary trade, in which they compete, sparing nothing in their path.

Ignatich has the best house in the village, he has everything his heart desires, he has a huge amount in his bank account, but the thirst and habit of taking from nature to the maximum leads him to a dangerous situation.

Idea The story is that a person must live in harmony with nature, otherwise he is threatened with death. After reading the story, the only true conclusion comes - in order to appreciate nature, a person must remember that he is part of it. The story that happened to Ignatich symbolizes the future of mankind (it will fall into its own traps) if people do not reconsider their relationship with nature.

Composition

The story has a classic three-part composition with an exposition, but without an epilogue. The denouement comes unexpectedly, when Ignatich feels that the fish has escaped and swam away, which means he has a chance for life. The last words of the story sound wise and solemn, the protagonist bows before a powerful force that gave him the opportunity to correct mistakes and continue his earthly path. The story has a circular composition associated with the theme of water as a powerful element: it “falls” into the water at the beginning of the work and is again “reborn” from the water after the river gives it a second chance.

Genre

In terms of volume and content, the cycle of Astafiev's short stories claimed the genre of the novel. But the writer did not want to take on such a large-scale artistic responsibility, he was more interested in the semantic part of the future work. The author titled his book “narrative within stories”, many literary critics call them short stories because of the vivid plot.

Thus, the narrative genre in the stories emphasizes their isolation, but the commonality of characters and ideas makes the book whole and easy to understand. A single artistic space in the cycle of stories serves one important purpose - to expose poaching and a barbaric attitude towards nature, to stop a large-scale ecological catastrophe that threatens humanity.

In the story "King-fish", from my point of view, a very complex and important psychological question is raised, which consists in the relationship between the individual and society. In the role of the first here is Ignatich, and in the role of the second - the inhabitants of his native village of Chush. Ignatich is a jack of all trades, ready to help anyone and demanding nothing for it, a good owner, a skilled mechanic, and a true fisherman. But this is not the main thing in it. The main thing in Ignatich is his attitude towards the rest of the Chushan people with a certain amount of condescension and superiority. It is this indulgence and superiority, though not displayed by him, that forms the gulf between them. From the outside, it looks as if Ignatich is one step higher than his fellow countrymen.
I would especially like to emphasize what the author himself says about Ignatich: "He was from here - a Siberian and by nature herself was accustomed to honor the "optism", to reckon with him, not to irritate him, but at the same time do not break his hat too much, or, as it is explained here , - on giving yourself an ax to drop on your feet. It is this one sentence, in my opinion, that contains the whole point of the story. It is necessary to understand the character of Ignatich consistently. Strict, unambiguous labels "negative" or "positive" hero are by no means applicable to him.
And so, the first thought when reading the story is "Ignatich's character is very contradictory." Yes, this is true, but this is easily explained by his independence. Yes, it's independence. It seems to me that Ignatich, in his childhood just Zinka, grew up relying only on himself. He did not want to ask for help from others, believing that he could achieve everything himself. And indeed, he achieved everything on his own, but only while growing up, he became so distant from the society in which he lived that, having achieved everything, he remained on his own.
In my opinion, while he was growing up, his own little world with its own orders and laws was formed in his soul. In addition, helping other people seemingly disinterestedly, Ignatich actually developed in them a special attitude towards his personality. At first it was not noticeable, but as soon as Ignatich confidently got to his feet, he declared his position in society. Most likely, he thought like this: "I do everything that you need and how you need it, but I also don’t take anything for it, so don’t touch me and don’t teach me how to live." All this was aggravated by the habit of silent communication acquired by Ignatich, the one that so repelled people from him.
Rising to his feet, Ignatich involuntarily stands above the society, which he helped all the time. This is explained by the fact that everyone, most likely, owes him something, since once in his time he helped them with something. Thus, a certain psychological terror of Ignatich is explained, which consists in clean clothes, a good house, and a brilliant ability to fish. He puts this pressure on the entire village. That is, in fact, the definition given by the author himself of the relationship between "optism" and Ignatich is refuted. In fact, he does not honor him, does not consider him, and constantly annoys him with his behavior.
Having shown this, making it clear to the reader who Ignatich really is, the author proceeds to punish his hero. This punishment appeared to him in the form of a king-fish, about which he learned a lot from his grandfather, a fisherman. Relying, as always, only on his own strength, this time Ignatich paid dearly. This rash decision almost cost him his life. But while he was in the water with this fish, he seemed to me to have changed a lot. The whole point is that

    Man and nature - this is perhaps the most relevant topic of our modern literature. This problem has been facing mankind for many years. Every year, factories and factories throw away a huge amount of waste, polluting the air, rivers, harming the environment ...

    Works, one way or another connected with the theme of the village, are usually called "village prose". Books of very different genres have been written about the village: the stories of V. Astafyev and V. Rasputin, the socially epic trilogy of F. Abramov, the moralizing novels of V....

    "King-fish" is an extensive work, consisting of separate stories. Each of these stories is a separate story. But all of them are united by one common idea, the same question sounds in all: what should be the real owner of the earth ...

    Victor Astafiev is one of the talented writers of our days. He was born in 1924, spent his childhood and youth in Siberia. All life and work are connected with the native and close to his heart region; the writer always returns to his native place, no matter where...

To use the preview of presentations, create an account for yourself ( account) Google and sign in: https://accounts.google.com


Slides captions:

Man and nature in the story of V.P. Astafieva "Tsar-fish" Teacher of the Russian language and literature Levshina I.A.

Viktor Petrovich Astafyev (1924-2002) Viktor Astafyev was born on May 1, 1924 in the village of Ovsyanka (now the Krasnoyarsk Territory) in the family of Lidia Ilyinichna Potylitsina and Pyotr Pavlovich Astafyev. He was the third child in the family, but his two older sisters died in infancy. A few years after the birth of his son, Pyotr Astafiev ends up in prison with the wording "wrecking". During the next trip of Lydia to her husband, the boat in which, among others, she sailed, capsized. Lydia Potylitsina, having fallen into the water, caught her scythe on a floating boom and drowned. Her body was found only a few days later. Victor was then seven years old. After the death of his mother, Victor lived with her parents - Ekaterina Petrovna and Ilya Evgrafovich Potylitsin. Viktor Astafiev spoke about his childhood spent with his grandmother Katerina Petrovna and left bright memories in the writer’s soul in the first part of his autobiography “The Last Bow”.

Theme of nature and ecology Top topics Creativity Astafiev - military and rural. One of his first works was an essay written at school, later turned by the writer into the story Vasyutkino Lake. The first stories of the author were published in the magazine "Change". Most of the stories he wrote for children were included in the collection The Horse with the Pink Mane. But the most important work related to the theme of nature is "King-fish"

Monument to V.P. Astafiev in Krasnoyarsk. Sculptor Igor Linevich-Yavorsky

Summary Ignatich is the protagonist of the novel. This man is respected by fellow villagers for the fact that he is always happy to help with advice and deed, for his skill in catching fish, for his intelligence and sharpness. This is the most prosperous person in the village, he does everything “okay” and reasonably. Often he helps people, but there is no sincerity in his actions. The hero of the novel does not have good relations with his brother either. In the village Ignatich is known as the most successful and skilled fisherman. It is felt that he has an abundance of fishing flair, the experience of his ancestors and his own, acquired over the years. Ignatich often uses his skills to the detriment of nature and people, as he is engaged in poaching. Exterminating fish without counting, causing irreparable damage to the natural resources of the river, he is aware of the illegality and unseemliness of his actions, he is afraid of the “shame” that can befall him if the poacher is caught in the dark by a fish supervision boat. Forcing Ignatich to fish more than he needed, greed, greed at any cost. This played a fatal role for him when he met the king-fish. The fish looked like a "prehistoric lizard", "eyes without eyelids, without eyelashes, naked, looking with snake coldness, concealed something in themselves." Ignatich is struck by the size of the sturgeon, which grew up on the same “goats” and “twits”, he is surprised to call it “the mystery of nature.” From the very beginning, from the moment Ignatich saw the king-fish, something “ominous” seemed to him in her, and later realized that "one cannot cope with such a monster." The desire to call for help from a brother with a mechanic was replaced by an all-consuming greed: “To share the sturgeon? .. There are two buckets of caviar in the sturgeon, if not more. Caviar for three too?!” Ignatich at that moment was even ashamed of his own feelings. But after a while, “greed he considered passion”, and the desire to catch the sturgeon turned out to be stronger than the voice of reason. In addition to the thirst for profit, there was another reason that forced Ignatich to measure his strength with a mysterious creature. This is a fishing prowess. “Ah, there was not! thought the protagonist of the novel. - Tsar-fish comes across once in a lifetime, and even then not “every Jacob”. Having cast aside doubts, "successfully, with all the fluff, Ignatich slammed the butt of the ax into the forehead of the king-fish ...". Soon, the unlucky fisherman found himself in the water, entangled in his own hooks with hooks that stuck into the bodies of Ignatich and the fish. “The king of the river and the king of all nature are in the same trap,” the author writes. Then the fisherman realized that the huge sturgeon "is not up to his hand." Yes, he knew this from the very beginning of their struggle, but "because of a sort of reptile, a man was forgotten in a man." Ignatich and the tsar-fish "married in one share." Both of them are waiting for death. A passionate desire to live makes a person tear off the hooks; in desperation, he even speaks to the sturgeon. “Well, what do you think! .. I’m waiting for my brother, and who are you?” - Ignatich prays. The lust for life pushes the hero, and even then, to overcome his own pride. He shouts: "Br-ate-elni-i-i-ik! .." Ignatich feels that he is dying. The fish "tightly and carefully pressed against him with a thick and tender belly." The hero of the short story experienced superstitious horror at this almost feminine tenderness of the cold fish. He understood: the sturgeon is clinging to him because death awaits them both. At this moment, a person begins to remember his childhood, youth, maturity. In addition to pleasant memories, thoughts come that his failures in life were associated with poaching. Ignatich begins to realize that brutal fishing will always be a heavy burden on his conscience. The hero of the novel also remembered the old grandfather, who instructed the young fishermen: “And if you, robyaty, have something for your soul, a grave sin, what a shame, barnacleism - don’t mess with the king-fish, you’ll get codes - send it right away.” The grandfather's words make Astafiev's hero think about his past. What sin did Ignatitch commit? It turned out that a heavy fault lies on the conscience of the fisherman. Having outraged the feelings of the bride, he committed an offense that has no justification. Ignatich realized that this incident with the king-fish was a punishment for his bad deeds. Turning to God, Ignatich asks: “Lord! May you separate us! Let this creature go free! She doesn't suit me!" He asks for forgiveness from the girl whom he once offended: After that, the king-fish is freed from the hooks and swims away to its native element, carrying "dozens of deadly uds" in its body. Ignatich immediately feels better: the body - because the fish did not hang on it like a dead weight, the soul - because nature forgave him, gave him another chance to atone for all sins and start a new life.

Dictionary work What is the meaning of the words "MAN" "NATURE" "SOUL" SPIRITUAL "SPIRITUALITY" What is common between them? What does V. Astafiev say about poachers?

Conclusion: Man is a part of nature Man and nature are a single whole

Non-standard book The publication of the chapters of "King Fish" in periodicals went with such losses in the text that the author went to the hospital from grief and since then never returned to the story, did not restore or make new editions. Only many years later, having found in his archive the pages yellowed from time to time, removed by the censorship of the chapter "Norilsk", he published it in 1990 under the title "There is not enough heart". Fully "Tsar-fish" was published only in 1993.

What does V. Astafiev say about poachers? Why paid so much attention to them?

What is the meaning of showing the fate of this hero?

What can you say about the idea of ​​the work? Interfering with the life of nature, violating the ecology, a person commits a moral crime Harmony of relations can be preserved only thanks to the experience of previous generations

Student's message Features of the landscape in "Tsar Fish" They say there are places in the world, Where nature speaks to you, Where we become like children, The mind sleeps and the soul does not hurt. I want to visit this place, to sit in absolute silence, to understand myself. To be honest, Escape from reality into a fairy tale... In this fairy tale there is no evil, no violence, No deceit, death does not go there, There is no need to scream from impotence, To look at suffering and torment. I want everyone to have such a secret corner in their lives! So that he can "comb" his thoughts, To keep him and the shore.

Man Despite the fact that your age is short, You make it shorter, man, You destroy and do not think that you and your children will have to live in it. Think, please, about what the world in which we live has become like. “The world is big,” you answer. “What will happen if there is no beauty?” “There will not be fewer people in the world” Are you sure of your answer?

Preview:

Project "Man and nature in the story

V. Astafiev "Tsar - fish".

Levshina Inna Alexandrovna

Teacher of Russian language and literature

MOU "LYCEUM № 1 pos. Lvovskiy»

Podolsky municipal district M O

84967606194

Objective of the project : development of a lesson on the work of V.P. Astafiev.

Subject : Literature

Program : In Korovina, Enlightenment, 2008

Class : 11th grade

Textbook : "Literature", V.P. Zhuravlev, M., Enlightenment, 2010

Subject : "Man and nature in the story of V. Astafiev "Tsar-fish"".

Lesson type : combined, lesson-reflection.

Target:

contribute to the education of a negative position towards a predatory, consumerist attitude towards nature; ability to connect ecological problems with moral; develop independence of judgment; to form the skills of comparison of analysis; generalizations.

Tasks

Educational: checking the level of knowledge on the material of the story, the ability to analyze the text and draw conclusions.

Educational : development of moral qualities, providing a situation of emotional experience.

Developing: continue the formation of the development of students' speech by independently forming conclusions and generalizations; continue to develop discussion skills.

Equipment : portrait of V.P. Astafiev, illustrations for the story, computer.

Epigraph: "People obey the laws of nature, even when they act against them."

J. W. Goethe.

During the classes

Lesson stage

Time

me

Teaching method

Teacher activity

Student activities

Means of education

Notes

Organizational

1 min.

Checking the readiness of the class for the lesson

Report of the attendant on the absent

Actualization of students' knowledge

3 min.

Story

introduction

Perception of the story

Illustrated

walkie-talkie Portrait of V.P. Astafieva,

slides 1-4

Working on new material

4 min.

Conversation

goal setting

Understanding the content of the story "Tsar-fish"

Demonstration of illustrations for the book "King-fish",

slide5

Using Presentation Materials

Independent work

5 minutes.

Method of independent work with a dictionary

Assignment to students

Finding out the meaning of words on the topic of the lesson with a note in a notebook

Vocabulary

V. Dahl,

slides 6-7

Checking homework

5 minutes.

Knowledge test method

Statement of a question aimed at clarifying the formation of the level of the reader's judgment

Sharing reading experiences

Slide 8

Work with text

15 minutes.

Conversation

Asking questions about the content of the text of the story

Story analysis

Slides 9-11

Consolidation of knowledge

5 minutes.

Dispute

Statement of a question aimed at identifying the position of the author

Discussion of the ideological content

Slides 12-13

creative work

5 minutes.

Story

Checking the creative task

Homework message

Presentation

Slides 14-17

Reflection

2 minutes.

Final word

Summing up the lesson, generalization

Slide 18

Plan - lesson summary

Literature in 11 "S-G" class.

Lesson topic: Man and nature in the story of V.P. Astafiev "King fish"

Target: contribute to the education of a negative position towards a predatory, consumerist attitude towards nature; to form the skills of comparison, analysis, communication. Ability to connect environmental problems with moral ones; develop independence of judgment.

Tasks:

Educational:

Checking the level of knowledge on the material of the story, the ability to analyze the text and draw conclusions

Educational:

Development of moral qualities:

Provide a situation of emotional experience.

Developing:

Continue the formation of the development of students' speech by independently forming conclusions and generalizations.

Continue building discussion skills.

Lesson type: Lesson - reflection

Equipment: portrait of V.P. Astafiev, illustrations for the story, presentation.

Epigraph:

People obey the laws of nature, even when they act against them.

I.V. Goethe.

During the classes.

I. Introductory speech of the teacher

Viktor Petrovich Astafiev (1924-2002) passed away quite recently. People like him are called the conscience of the nation. Susceptibility and sensitivity to people, rage when meeting with evil, utmost honesty and the ability to see the world in a new way, tough demands on oneself and

Sentimentality is just some of the features of his extraordinary personality.

In “narration in the cycle of stories “Tsar-Fish” (1976), the author speaks of the need for the urgency of “returning to nature” V.P. Astafiev is interested in the connection between man and nature in the moral and philosophical aspect. The attitude to nature acts as a test of the spiritual viability of the individual.

II. Work on the content of the story.

Remember summary the story "King-fish"

The poacher Ignatich caught a huge sturgeon fish on the Yenisei, but when he tried to transfer it to the boat, he fell into the water and caught himself on the hooks of the trap. So the man was trapped along with his victim. Having exhausted himself, entangled in hooks from his own traps, connected by one fatal chain with the king-fish, as a result, the hero repented of his sins and refused to prey. At the end, the fish is released and leaves.

III. Vocabulary work.

Exercise : the meanings of the words "man", "nature", "soul", "spiritual", "spirituality"

Result : notebook entry:

"Man is a part of nature", man and nature are a single whole"

IV. Sharing reader experiences.

The book "Tsar-fish" turned out to be a disturber of literary tranquility, discussions began around it on the pages of magazines and newspapers.

"Tsar-fish" landed in the most painful place of the problem "Man and Nature"

What excited you when you read the book?

V. Analysis of the story "Tsar-fish"

What does V. Astafiev say about poachers?

Why paid so much attention to them?

(Poaching is a terrible evil. The author shows the poacher Ignatich. What has its own gold of human love, human dignity, but all this is suppressed by boundless predation, which has turned into a desire to snatch an extra piece).

What is the meaning of showing the fate of this hero?

(the meaning is that a person who does evil and finds an excuse for himself admits the existence of evil everywhere).

What is the main fault of Ignatich? (This is a desecration of the girl who loved him. It turns out that having started to do evil, it is almost impossible to stop. The killer of the Commander's daughter is the spiritual twin of Ignatich. The circles of cruelty spread widely and mercilessly).

(Astafiev condemns poaching as a multifaceted evil and terrible in its destructive power, and the writer is talking not only about the destruction of animate and inanimate nature outside of us, he speaks of a kind of suicide, about the destruction of nature inside a person, human nature).

What causes the openly hostile attitude of the author towards such people as Goga and poachers?

(This is spirituality. Spirituality is not in the sense of a lack of cultural interests, but in the sense of a refusal to recognize the moral laws that unite people and nature, the lack of responsibility for everything that is not “I”).

VI. Discussion of the ideological content.

(It is painful for Astafiev to watch how his countrymen violated the old commandment and decided on robbery brutal fishing. He does not judge the heroes, but cares about their spiritual healing, speaks from the standpoint of goodness, humanity, against the barbaric position).

What can you say about the idea of ​​the work?

(By interfering in the life of nature, grossly violating the ecological environment, a person commits a moral crime. Whoever is merciless to nature is merciless to all living things, and therefore to himself. In the symbolic picture of the combat between man and nature, there can be no victory on either side, since man and nature are “tied to one mortal end”)

The harmony of relations can be preserved only thanks to the spiritual and historical experience of previous generations. Astafiev's man does not triumph, proving his superiority, but begging the fish for salvation. One can agree that people act against the laws of nature, but obey the laws of nature.

VII. Student's message "Features of the landscape in the story" King Fish "

VIII. The result of the lesson. Teacher's word.

The world for V.P. Astafiev is the world of people and nature, which is in the eternal. An inseparable and contradictory unity, the violation of which threatens with degeneration and death. Great is his faith in the triumph of good, in the fact that each of us will be able to know himself as a person.