Composition of the frog fable asking for the king. Analysis of the fable "The Frogs Asking for a King"

Fables I.A. Krylova is a special satirical genre inherited from antiquity. In the era of classicism, fables belonged to the "low" genres, so they sounded like simple colloquial speech. The heroes of fables could be either people from the people, or animals, reflecting certain character traits.

In the fable "The Frogs Asking for a Tsar" the Frogs become heroes, but this, of course, is an allegory. Allegory - allegory - one of the characteristic features of the fable. The Frogs are people who ask the gods to give them a sovereign. Zeus gave them the King, but it was an aspen block that did not react to anything. Having rested from fear, the Frogs became bold and bold, and then did not put the new ruler in anything at all. Having asked Jupiter to give them another King, "truly for glory", they received the power of the Crane. Now another extreme awaited them: the Crane ate the guilty, "and there is no one right at his trial." Soon the Frogs repented of their desire and again prayed to Jupiter, "that even they cannot ... neither stick their nose out, nor croak safely." But now Jupiter does not make concessions.

Jupiter's concluding words are the moral of the fable, a brief instructive statement that contains the main meaning of the fable:

“… Was a King given to you? - so he was too quiet:

You rebelled in your puddle

Another is given to you - so this one is very dashing;

Live with him so that it doesn’t get worse for you!

This is a lesson for people: they want to change their lives through outside interference, not taking into account the fact that society should develop gradually, historically. Stupid Frogs proceed only from their ideas about power, but their mind is not enough to understand the need for a gradual development of social relations. For this they are punished by God. In the fable, the author uses colloquial and colloquial expressions: “cracked into the kingdom”, “from all the Frogs’ legs in fright they rushed about”, “here, more than ever, both croaking and groaning”, “swallows them like flies”. Many words and expressions are outdated (“Why didn’t you know how to live happily before?”). But the thought Krylov's fable not outdated, it is still significant, causing both sadness and laughter at the same time.

1. The connection of Krylov's work with the social life of Russia and the historical events that took place in Russia and Europe. 2. Events of 1812 and their reflection in the work of Krylov ("Wolf in the kennel", "Cat and Cook", "Crow and Chicken"). 3. Disadvantages of monarchical rule in the fable "The Frogs Asking for the Tsar". The outstanding Russian writer, fabulist I. A. Krylov was one of those who laid the foundations of realism in Russian literature. Behind the images of animals that have become the favorite characters of his fables, people with certain character traits are easily guessed; but the author's contemporaries correlated them with specific individuals. Many of Krylov's fables are a kind of response to historical events that had great value not only for Russia, but for the whole of Europe. The events of 1812 - the victory of Russian troops over the Napoleonic army - inspired many writers, including Krylov. One of his most famous fables dedicated to these events is "The Wolf in the Kennel".

In a witty and subtle manner, Krylov narrates about the peace proposals of the cornered Wolf (that is, Emperor Napoleon): “I, your old matchmaker and godfather, / Came to make peace with you, not at all for the sake of a quarrel; / Let's forget the past, set a common mood! Krylov sent this fable to Field Marshal Kutuzov, who read it to the troops. “You are gray, and I, buddy, am gray,” the Stalker says to the Wolf in the fable. The hint is obvious: the Russian commander was not young, and the gray frock coat of the emperor of the French was quite famous. This fable contains an unambiguous call to fight the enemy until the final victory: “... I have known your wolf nature for a long time; / Therefore, my custom: / With wolves otherwise do not make peace, / How to remove the skin from them off. The fable “The Cat and the Cook” ridicules the indecisiveness of Tsar Alexander I, while the Napoleonic army had already captured more than one European state, and the Emperor of France was preparing to attack Russia: do not spend in vain, /Where you need to use the power. Another fable dedicated to the war with Napoleon is "The Crow and the Hen". It tells about the surrender of Moscow to the French, but, like in all Krylov's fables, it contains an eternal meaning that does not depend on the era and historical events: “So often a person is blind and stupid in calculations. / For happiness, it seems you are rushing on your heels: / But how do you actually deal with it - / Caught like a crow in soup! The historical analogies of the fable "The Frogs Asking for a Tsar" are not so transparent and obvious. “The frogs did not like it / The board of the people ...” - with these words the fabulist begins his story. This beginning naturally gives rise to an association with the calling of the Varangian princes to Russia; however, further narration refutes such an assumption. There is no doubt that Prince Rurik, who managed to subjugate the heterogeneous Slavic tribes, cannot be compared with the aspen block from Krylov's fable. Jupiter's answer to the frogs' repeated request for a king gives rise to another suggestion, that we are talking about the accession of the Romanov dynasty, about Tsar Mikhail, who ascended the throne at a young age and did not have enough life experience and firmness of character necessary for the ruler, as well as about Tsar Peter Alekseevich, whose beginning of rule was marked by archery riots, and whose decisive innovations caused discontent among many . However, it is rather difficult to draw a clear historical parallel; therefore, all that has been said about this fable should be considered only vague conjectures, nothing more. Another thing is obvious: in this fable, Krylov shows us a very common feature of human nature - it is quickly fed up with calmness and peace, starting to look for unrest and confusion. The result is very often disastrous; people find what they are looking for, but it does not correspond at all to their ideas about this subject. As a result, the situation of people worsens due to their own efforts. They begin to grumble at Fate, at God, at anyone - but in vain. This is approximately the meaning of Krylov's fable "The Frogs Asking for the Tsar". Many other Krylov's fables can be correlated with specific events, but it seems that this is not the main thing at all. The genius of an artist of any era, first of all, is that the work will remain forever young, that is, relevant, after a long period of time - and always, as long as people live on earth.

An analysis of the fable "The Frogs Asking for a Tsar" makes it possible to emphasize the negative perception of rulers and leaders in society. A work written more than 200 years ago, in certain cases, can be an example for some today.

From Aesop to Krylov

Since ancient literature, the fable has occupied a special place. She was able to notice such traits of a human character that were always considered vicious and caused negative feelings. The first to speak of human minuses in the language of a fable was the wisest ancient Greek poet-philosopher Aesop. The ability not to name a specific person, resorting to allegory, indicated shortcomings that needed to be combated.

Lafontaine became his follower. "The Frogs Asking for a King" is a fable that belongs to his pen. Allegory allows the authors to make representatives of the animal world the main characters. To understand how this technique works, you need to analyze the fable "The Frogs Asking for the King."

So what is this piece about? A long time ago, the inhabitants of the swamps wanted to be led by a king. Jupiter heeded their request and sent a huge aspen block to their kingdom. The frogs were afraid of him, but then, having taken courage, they began to behave outrageously, despite the high title of their new master.

Churban did not interfere with anything, did not reproach his subjects for anything. But he did nothing for them. This caused discontent in the whole environment of the king. The frogs wanted a quick sovereign, and they again turned to Jupiter with such a request.

The serpent ascended the throne. Agile and beautiful, she severely punished disobedience. Even innocent frogs became her dinner. The survivors complained to the heavenly ruler. Jupiter was surprised, but refused the next request of the frogs, promising them to send a ruler even worse than the previous ones as king.

Zeus' warning

Not only Lafontaine wrote about dissatisfaction with those in power, Krylov also addresses this topic, “The Frogs Asking for the Tsar” - fable, which is also in his collection. Frogs mean people. At Krylov, as before, the aspen block, which was replaced by the Crane, becomes the first dumb ruler.

In order to contrast the process of government and more vividly describe the position of the frogs, the authors of the fables choose the snake and the crane as the second kings, because both of them love to feast on frogs. A quiet and calm king was given, he was underestimated, he did not want a quiet and calm life, it seemed too boring and uninteresting to the frogs. And the other one was even worse. It is not for nothing that they say: "They do not seek good from good." “Live with him so that it doesn’t get worse for you!” Zeus warns the frogs.

The analysis of the fable “The Frogs Asking for a King” will help determine what the moral is in this fable. And it’s simple: you can’t change everything at once. It must be borne in mind that everything in nature has its development, but it happens gradually. If the frogs had been patient, they would have adapted to the block and even learned to derive great benefit from communicating with it. The essence of fable morality has not lost its relevance.

About rhyme, characters of heroes

A fable written by Ivan Andreevich Krylov ("The Frogs Asking for the Tsar"), in verse. The author has a very clear rhyme: sideways - prone, next to him - backwards, power - glory.

The main drawback that prevails in society and noted by the author is a painful passion for change, an unwillingness to accept the existing situation as it is, a desire to change one's former way of life without relying on the past and one's own experience. The frogs began to "dislike the rule of the people", "didn't like to live freely and freely."

The author's most vivid memorable phrases are: "cracked into the kingdom", "it seemed completely ignoble."

The main characters of the fable are frogs, they are in constant contact with Zeus and the changing kings. Because of characteristic features character can be called:

cowardly;
obsequious to those who are much higher than them in status.

But as soon as they feel impunity, they immediately show their disdain for the king by turning their backs on him. Zeus is very attentive to all requests addressed to him.

The king blockhead is sedate, silent, of great stature.
A crane of a different disposition, does not like to pamper anyone and do indulgence to someone. It has two looks. This is a bird that eats frogs. A formidable king who punishes his subjects indiscriminately.

Nationality of the work

In the fable “The Frogs Asking for a King”, morality can be replaced by famous proverbs: "better a tit in the hands than a crane in the sky", "horses do not roam from the feed", "they do not seek good from good".

Krylov always likes to show through laughter and gentle banter what moments are worth thinking about. And there are a great many of them in the fable.

As you know, people take bright expressions from famous works that they actively use in their everyday speech, thereby making these expressions winged, aphoristic. These phrases decorate the speaker's vocabulary. In addition, colloquial speech brings the work closer to the people. Here are some examples: “to help the grief”, “swallows like flies”, “not sticking your nose out”, “why - why”.

Krylov's views and their expression in fables

In any case, the phrase spoken by Zeus at the very end of the work makes an indelible impression. It sounds like this: "Live with him, so that it doesn't get worse for you!". Thus, the analysis of the fable "The Frogs Asking for the Tsar" allows us to say that this is a very sharp and acute topic, in which the author tried to express his negative attitude towards the ruling imperial elite as much as possible. The fabulist believed that there are no good kings, and each subsequent ruler will only get worse. During his creative life, the demon Ivan Andreevich Krylov wrote a lot: "The Frog Asking for the Tsar", "The Convoy" and others, in which, without fear of punishment, he boldly shows his attitude towards the Russian tsars.

Thus the moral of the fable can be applied to the present day. No matter how good the leader, the ruler - a person always expresses his dissatisfaction with his work and wants something new. And he may turn out to be a fake chump or a crane.

We will not only now analyze the fable "The Frogs Asking for a Tsar", but we will also see what the moral of the fable is. The author of this wonderful work is Ivan Andreevich Krylov. Of course, the work was written two centuries ago, but even today it has not lost its relevance. To see this, first consider the plot of the fable, and it is quite short.

To highlight the main topic, the author resorts to allegory, that is, the main characters are animals. The inhabitants of the swamps somehow wanted to have a king. They began to ask Zeus about this, and he, in turn, put a ruler over them, which turned out to be an aspen block. Although the frogs were afraid of him, very soon they realized that the king was harmless - he did not even make a single reproach to them and did not interfere with their lives, allowing everything. However, there was little benefit from such a king. Then the frogs decided that another ruler would be better, and made a corresponding request to Zeus.

To see the moral of the Frogs Begging for a King fable, let's look at what happened next. Indeed, the first one was replaced by a new king - the Crane, and he turned out to be much more agile, but the Crane ate even innocent frogs, from which their life turned into a real nightmare. Having again asked the ruler, already the third in a row, the frogs were refused.

What is the moral of the fable

The moral of the fable is the most important thing in this kind of work. In other words, after reading a fable, you need to think about what it can teach and how not to repeat mistakes in your life. Here, when we talk about the moral of the fable "The Frogs Asking for a King", it is clear that changes do not occur from scratch and instantly. Nature is arranged in such a way that everything develops according to plan and everything has its time. Do not rush things and for the sake of the unknown give up what is now.

For example, if they waited a little while the blockhead was the king of the frogs, they would understand that both communication with him and his rule can be useful. In fact, it took time to adjust to this ruler and new circumstances. Constantly wanting change, insatiability appears, and a person will never get what he wants, he will always be dissatisfied with something. This is evident from the analysis of the fable "The Frogs Asking for a King".

Society has always had a serious defect, and the author of the fable was able to emphasize it remarkably. People constantly want change, they do not accept the existing order, they do not like the current way of life, they strive for a new life. Is this bad? On the one hand, no. But it is not the craving for the best that is bad, but the inability to notice the good that is on this moment. In addition, the fabulist Krylov wanted to vividly express the idea that there is no king who would ideally suit everyone. It is quite possible that the next king to replace the previous one will be much worse.

So, the analysis of the work and the moral of the fable "The Frogs Asking for the Tsar" are very clear. It's easy to remember the main thing. Read the fable in its entirety, if you have not yet been able to do so, to make sure that our conclusion is correct. We recommend reading other articles of our literary

From Aesop to Krylov

Zeus' warning

Not only Lafontaine wrote about dissatisfaction with those in power, Krylov also addresses this topic, “The Frogs Asking for the Tsar” - fable, which is also in his collection. By frogs, the famous fabulist means people. At Krylov, as before, the aspen block, which was replaced by the Crane, becomes the first dumb ruler.

About rhyme, characters of heroes

A fable written by Ivan Andreevich Krylov ("The Frogs Asking for the Tsar"), in verse. The author has a very clear rhyme: sideways - prone, next - backwards, power - glory.

The author's most vivid memorable phrases are: "cracked into the kingdom", "it seemed completely ignoble."

The main characters of the fable are frogs, they are in constant contact with Zeus and the changing kings. Because of the characteristic traits of character, they can be called:

cowardly;
obsequious to those who are much higher than them in status.

But as soon as they feel impunity, they immediately show their disdain for the king by turning their backs on him. Zeus is very attentive to all requests addressed to him.

The king blockhead is sedate, silent, of great stature.
A crane of a different disposition, does not like to pamper anyone and do indulgence to someone. It has two looks. This is a bird that eats frogs. A formidable king who punishes his subjects indiscriminately.

Nationality of the work

In the fable “The Frogs Asking for the Tsar”, morality can be replaced with well-known proverbs: “a titmouse in the hands is better than a crane in the sky”, “horses do not roam from feed”, “they do not seek good from good”.

Krylov always likes to show through laughter and gentle banter what moments are worth thinking about. And there are a great many of them in the fable.

As you know, people take bright expressions from famous works that they actively use in their everyday speech, thereby making these expressions winged, aphoristic. These phrases decorate the speaker's vocabulary. In addition, colloquial speech brings the work closer to the people. Here are some examples: “to help grief”, “swallows like flies”, “not sticking your nose out”, “why - why”.