What vices does the fabulist show? What human vices and shortcomings he ridicules in his fables And
Krylov's fables is an excellent school for observing life, phenomena, and characters. Fables interest both in dynamic plots and in the depiction of the characters of the characters, in particular animals, insects, birds. Each fable read causes a person to think.
Reading the fable of Demyan's ear, you understand: the story the author tells is not at all about specific Demyan and Foku, and not about the ear and excessive hospitality. Dem'yan personifies such traits as obsession, pickiness, importunity, inability to respect the desires of another person. And the fable also teaches: beautiful intentions do not always have good consequences.
The inability to work together, caring about a common cause, and not about their own tastes, is personified by the characters in the fable "The Swan, Pike and Cancer." The last line of this fable - "But things are still there" - became winged saying... Sometimes with the help of these words they characterize the state of affairs of a person who is not able to complete what he started. The fable helps to understand: before taking on any business, you need to weigh well both your capabilities and the capabilities of your accomplices. Otherwise, "only torment" will come out of that business.
Krylov exposes the ignorant and ignorant in the fable "The Monkey and the Glasses." Some people are very similar to the character in the fable: unable to understand a certain phenomenon, they deny or prohibit it. Many characters in Krylov's fables seem to have come from folk tales... Their "characters" are well known, but the author creates situations in which their essence is revealed.
The fox is a character in many fairy tales. This image is used when you need to portray cunning, slyness. In the fable "The Crow and the Fox," it is the trick that helps the Fox to get hold of a piece of cheese. But the fable condemns not cunning and cunning, but sycophancy and those who believe any words so that only they are pleasant. Krylov's fables expose various flaws in human characters and teach the art of living with dignity.
Common and excellent fables of Krylov "The Wolf and the Lamb" and the fable of the same name by Aesop
It is known that the plots of many fables originated in antiquity, but fabulists different countries use them to write new works.
How a new work appears on the basis of a well-known plot, let us try to investigate this using the example of the fables of Aesop and Krylov.
Aesop is a legendary poet who is considered the founder of the fable genre. Aesop's fables are prosaic, narrative, laconic. The main attention is paid to the clash between the carriers of certain traits or different life positions. In the fable "The Wolf and the Lamb" the characters of the characters are clearly defined: the Lamb personifies defenselessness, the Wolf - strength. Morality emerges from here: just defense is not valid for those who intend to do injustice.
Unlike Aesop, Krylov put the moral of his fable at the beginning, but the development of events in the fable is not perceived as a simple illustration of morality. In Krylov's work, the wolf becomes the embodiment of inexorable evil force, cruelty and willfulness, and the development of the plot before our eyes reveals the mechanism of action of this cruel force. Readers witness everything that happens to the characters.
At the beginning of the fable, the Lamb is not afraid of the Wolf, because he does not harm anyone in any way and does not violate the established rules. The senseless accusations made by the Wolf are easily refuted by the Lamb. There's a feeling in the Lamb's answers dignity... For a moment, readers even think that the Lamb has driven the Wolf to a dead end, because the predator has no more arguments to accuse. But it does not come out of this at all that after meeting with the Wolf, the Lamb will remain unharmed. Just the opposite. Each decent answer from the Lamb annoys the Wolf even more. Finally, the self-willed predator gets tired of looking for the imaginary guilt of his prey and he shows his essence. The last words of the fable: “He said - and in dark forest The wolf dragged the Lamb ”- both expected and unexpected. The reader knew from the very beginning that this should have happened, but, observing the development of events, he hoped that the Lamb would still bring his innocence.
In the fables of Aesop and Krylov, the plot, characters and even morality are common. Aesop's fable is written in prose, and Krylov's in poems. But, in my opinion, the most important thing that distinguishes these two fables is the very reader's perception of the works. Aesop's Fable is an appeal, so to speak, to the mind of the reader. And Krylov's fable - to his heart.
Krylov's fables is an excellent school for observing life, phenomena, and characters. Fables interest both in dynamic plots and in the depiction of the characters of the characters, in particular animals, insects, birds. Each fable read causes a person to think.
Reading the fable of Demyan's ear, you understand: the story the author tells is not at all about specific Demyan and Foku, and not about the ear and excessive hospitality. Dem'yan personifies such traits as obsession, pickiness, importunity, inability to respect the desires of another person. And the fable also teaches: beautiful intentions do not always have good consequences.
The inability to work together, caring about a common cause, and not about their own tastes, is personified by the characters in the fable "The Swan, Pike and Cancer." The last line of this fable - "But things are still there" - became a catch phrase. Sometimes with the help of these words they characterize the state of affairs of a person who is not able to complete what he started. The fable helps to understand: before taking on any business, you need to weigh well both your capabilities and the capabilities of your accomplices. Otherwise, "only torment" will come out of that business.
Krylov exposes the ignorant and ignorant in the fable "The Monkey and the Glasses." Some people are very similar to the character in the fable: unable to understand a certain phenomenon, they deny or prohibit it. Many characters in Krylov's fables seem to have come from folk tales. Their "characters" are well known, but the author creates situations in which their essence is revealed.
The fox is a character in many fairy tales. This image is used when you need to portray cunning, slyness. In the fable "The Crow and the Fox," it is the trick that helps the Fox to get hold of a piece of cheese. But the fable condemns not cunning and cunning, but sycophancy and those who believe any words so that only they are pleasant. Krylov's fables expose various flaws in human characters and teach the art of living with dignity.
Common and excellent fables of Krylov "The Wolf and the Lamb" and the fable of the same name by Aesop
It is known that the plots of many fables originated in antiquity, but fabulists from different countries use them to write new works.
How a new work appears on the basis of a well-known plot, let us try to investigate this using the example of the fables of Aesop and Krylov.
Aesop is a legendary poet who is considered the founder of the fable genre. Aesop's fables are prosaic, narrative, laconic. The main attention is paid to the clash between the carriers of certain traits or different life positions. In the fable "The Wolf and the Lamb" the characters of the characters are clearly defined: the Lamb personifies defenselessness, the Wolf - strength. Morality emerges from here: just defense is not valid for those who intend to do injustice.
Unlike Aesop, Krylov put the moral of his fable at the beginning, but the development of events in the fable is not perceived as a simple illustration of morality. In Krylov's work, the wolf becomes the embodiment of inexorable evil force, cruelty and willfulness, and the development of the plot before our eyes reveals the mechanism of action of this cruel force. Readers witness everything that happens to the characters.
At the beginning of the fable, the Lamb is not afraid of the Wolf, because he does not harm anyone in any way and does not violate the established rules. The senseless accusations made by the Wolf are easily refuted by the Lamb. There is self-esteem in the Lamb's responses. For a moment, readers even think that the Lamb has driven the Wolf to a dead end, because the predator has no more arguments to accuse. But it does not come out of this at all that after meeting with the Wolf, the Lamb will remain unharmed. Just the opposite. Each decent answer from the Lamb annoys the Wolf even more. Finally, the self-willed predator gets tired of looking for the imaginary guilt of his prey and he shows his essence. The last words of the fable: “The Wolf said - and into the dark forest the Wolf dragged the Lamb” - at the same time expected and unexpected. The reader knew from the very beginning that this should have happened, but, observing the development of events, he hoped that the Lamb would still bring his innocence.
In the fables of Aesop and Krylov, the plot, characters and even morality are common. Aesop's fable is written in prose, and Krylov's in poems. But, in my opinion, the most important thing that distinguishes these two fables is the very reader's perception of the works. Aesop's Fable is an appeal, so to speak, to the mind of the reader. And Krylov's fable - to his heart.
With the strong, the powerless is always to blame. This expression begins the fable "The Wolf and the Lamb" (1808). The work of Ivan Krylov itself is written according to the itinerant story popular in world literature, which was addressed by the most prominent fabulists of the world: Aesop, ...
Since childhood, we have known Krylov's fables. Clear, light, wise verses sink into the soul. Morality - and it is necessarily present in the fable - is gradually assimilated, and the power of its influence is enormous. Fables teach to be honest, to love the Fatherland, to work for the good ...
The name of the great Russian fabulist Ivan Andreevich Krylov is known all over the world. The fables of I. A. Krylov, according to N. V. Gogol, are “a genuine book folk wisdom". In his fables I.A.Krylov makes fun of the vices, shortcomings of people, inherent in them bad ...
I. A. Krylov's work began in the 18th century, when he published the well-known satirical magazines Mail of Spirits and Spectator, which played important role in the development of Russian democratic literature. At the end of the 18th - beginning of the 19th century. he wrote several dramatic ...
Option 1
1! Nsni I. L. Krylov is known and loved by adults and children, because they are written in a simple, vivid, lively language, and their meaning is clear to everyone. The favorite technique of the great fabulist is allegory. Under the guise of bellowing, bleating, snarling heroes of his works, ordinary people hide. Emphasizing the merits of some, I.A.Krylov humorously denounces and ridicules the shortcomings of others. So, in his fable "The Wolf in the Kennel" the poet exposes the cowardly, deceitful and hypocritical nature of the toothy predator, exalting the wisdom and worldly experience of the old trapper.
Reading the fable "The Donkey and the Nightingale", we laugh at the pompous words of the Donkey, who advises the feathered master of singing Nightingale to take lessons from the rooster: "You would have perked up more if you would have learned a little from him."
The sluggish, inactive judges in the fable "The Pike" also make the author laugh. Uncomplaining stupid Donkeys, Goats and old Nags are cleverly commanded by the cunning Fox, appointed by the Prosecutor "for the proper order of supervision." She is no stranger to such matters and skillfully rescues the criminal Pike, who “supplied the fish table” to her, having awarded her “both scary and dangerous” to drown her in the river.
Time passes, but today, like two hundred years ago, we meet with ignorance and deceit, stupidity and pride. That is why the fables of I.A.Krylov remain not only close and understandable, but also beloved by readers of different ages.
Option 2
I.A.Krylov is a famous Russian fabulist. In his fables, he ridicules human flaws and vices, such as stupidity, anger, deceit, cunning, hypocrisy, boastfulness, opposes lawlessness and injustice. We laugh heartily at the Donkey from the fable "The Donkey and the Nightingale", who took it into his head to teach the Nightingale the art of singing.
Of course, everyone knows that the Nightingale is an unsurpassed master of his craft, and the Donkey is too far from music to act as a judge on this issue. After all, it is no coincidence that he considers the throaty rooster to be the standard of singing art. But, unfortunately, in real life we often meet people who try to judge what they do not understand at all.
No less revealing is the fable "Pike", in which Krylov denounces nepotism and bribery, the lack of principle of the mighty of this world. So, the Fox-Prosecutor, whom the robber Shchuka "supplied the fish table", offers the judges to drown the guilty in the river as a "shameful execution", to which they agree.
But, fortunately, in the end there is a tamer for any villain, like a Wolf, who wanted to get into the sheepfold, but ended up in the kennel, where the hunter killed him.
The fables of I.A.Krylov conquer the reader with their wisdom and subtle understanding of human nature, help him become better, cleaner, kinder.
If homework on the topic: »REDUCTION OF HUMAN DISADVANTAGES IN KRYLOV'S BASNES turned out to be useful to you, then we will be grateful if you post a link to this message on your page in your social network.
& nbsp
(! LANG: Latest news
Categories
news
Essays on the topic
- In ancient times, the donkey, as the tale tells, sang better than the tenor. One day all the animals gathered for a council, and the lion that the Book of 1809 had includes several fables about which we can say that they are nothing more than a good translation from La Fontaine. One Krylov I. A. Essay on the work on the theme: The fable "The wolf in the kennel" Ivan Andreevich Krylov - an outstanding Russian writer-fabulist. In his works 1 option 1! Nsni I.L.
- USE test in chemistry Reversible and irreversible chemical reactions Chemical equilibrium Answers
Reversible and irreversible chemical reactions. Chemical equilibrium. Displacement of chemical equilibrium under the action various factors 1. Chemical equilibrium in the 2NO system (g)
Niobium in its compact state is a shiny silver-white (or gray in powder form) paramagnetic metal with a body-centered cubic crystal lattice.
Noun. Saturation of the text with nouns can become a means of linguistic depiction. The text of the poem by A. A. Fet “Whisper, timid breathing... ", in its
Asni Krylova is an excellent school of observations of life, phenomena, characters. Fables interest both in dynamic plots and in the depiction of the characters of the characters, in particular animals, insects, birds. Each fable read causes a person to think.
Reading the fable of Demyan's ear, you understand: the story the author tells is not at all about specific Demyan and Foku, and not about the ear and excessive hospitality. Dem'yan personifies such traits as obsession, pickiness, importunity, inability to respect the desires of another person. And the fable also teaches: beautiful intentions do not always have good consequences.
The inability to work together, caring about a common cause, and not about their own tastes, is personified by the characters in the fable "The Swan, Pike and Cancer." The last line of this fable - "But things are still there" - became a catch phrase. Sometimes with the help of these words they characterize the state of affairs of a person who is not able to complete what he started. The fable helps to understand: before taking on any business, you need to weigh well both your capabilities and the capabilities of your accomplices. Otherwise, "only torment" will come out of that business.
Krylov exposes the ignorant and ignorant in the fable "The Monkey and the Glasses." Some people are very similar to the character in the fable: unable to understand a certain phenomenon, they deny or prohibit it. Many characters in Krylov's fables seem to have come from folk tales. Their "characters" are well known, but the author creates situations in which their essence is revealed.
The fox is a character in many fairy tales. This image is used when you need to portray cunning, slyness. In the fable "The Crow and the Fox," it is the trick that helps the Fox to get hold of a piece of cheese. But the fable condemns not cunning and cunning, but sycophancy and those who believe any words so that only they are pleasant. Krylov's fables expose various flaws in human characters and teach the art of living with dignity.
Common and excellent fables of Krylov "The Wolf and the Lamb" and the fable of the same name by Aesop
It is known that the plots of many fables originated in antiquity, but fabulists from different countries use them to write new works.
How a new work appears on the basis of a well-known plot, let us try to investigate this using the example of the fables of Aesop and Krylov.
Aesop is a legendary poet who is considered the founder of the fable genre. Aesop's fables are prosaic, narrative, laconic. The main attention is paid to the clash between the carriers of certain traits or different life positions. In the fable "The Wolf and the Lamb" the characters of the characters are clearly defined: the Lamb personifies defenselessness, the Wolf - strength. Morality emerges from here: just defense is not valid for those who intend to do injustice.
Unlike Aesop, Krylov put the moral of his fable at the beginning, but the development of events in the fable is not perceived as a simple illustration of morality. In Krylov's work, the wolf becomes the embodiment of inexorable evil force, cruelty and willfulness, and the development of the plot before our eyes reveals the mechanism of action of this cruel force. Readers witness everything that happens to the characters.
At the beginning of the fable, the Lamb is not afraid of the Wolf, because he does not harm anyone in any way and does not violate the established rules. The senseless accusations made by the Wolf are easily refuted by the Lamb. There is self-esteem in the Lamb's responses. For a moment, readers even think that the Lamb has driven the Wolf to a dead end, because the predator has no more arguments to accuse. But it does not come out of this at all that after meeting with the Wolf, the Lamb will remain unharmed. Just the opposite. Each decent answer from the Lamb annoys the Wolf even more. Finally, the self-willed predator gets tired of looking for the imaginary guilt of his prey and he shows his essence. The last words of the fable: “The Wolf said - and into the dark forest the Wolf dragged the Lamb” - at the same time expected and unexpected. The reader knew from the very beginning that this should have happened, but, observing the development of events, he hoped that the Lamb would still bring his innocence.
The writing
Krylov's fables is an excellent school for observing life, phenomena, and characters. Fables interest both in dynamic plots and in the depiction of the characters of the characters, in particular animals, insects, birds. Each fable read causes a person to think.
Reading the fable of Demyan's ear, you understand: the story the author tells is not at all about specific Demyan and Foku, and not about the ear and excessive hospitality. Dem'yan personifies such traits as obsession, pickiness, importunity, inability to respect the desires of another person. And the fable also teaches: beautiful intentions do not always have good consequences.
The inability to work together, caring about a common cause, and not about their own tastes, is personified by the characters in the fable "The Swan, Pike and Cancer." The last line of this fable - "But things are still there" - became a catch phrase. Sometimes with the help of these words they characterize the state of affairs of a person who is not able to complete what he started. The fable helps to understand: before taking on any business, you need to weigh well both your capabilities and the capabilities of your accomplices. Otherwise, “only torment” will come out of that business.
Krylov exposes the ignorant and ignorant in the fable "The Monkey and the Glasses." Some people are very similar to the character in the fable: unable to understand a certain phenomenon, they deny or prohibit it. Many characters in Krylov's fables seem to have come from folk tales. Their "characters" are well known, but the author creates situations in which their essence is revealed.
The fox is a character in many fairy tales. This image is used when you need to portray cunning, slyness. In the fable "The Crow and the Fox," it is the trick that helps the Fox to get hold of a piece of cheese. But the fable condemns not cunning and cunning, but sycophancy and those who believe any words so that only they are pleasant. Krylov's fables expose various flaws in human characters and teach the art of living with dignity.
Common and excellent fables of Krylov "The Wolf and the Lamb" and the fable of the same name by Aesop
It is known that the plots of many fables originated in antiquity, but fabulists from different countries use them to write new works.
How a new work appears on the basis of a well-known plot, let us try to investigate this using the example of the fables of Aesop and Krylov.
Aesop is a legendary poet who is considered the founder of the fable genre. Aesop's fables are prosaic, narrative, laconic. The main attention is paid to the clash between the carriers of certain traits or different life positions. In the fable "The Wolf and the Lamb" the characters of the characters are clearly defined: the Lamb personifies defenselessness, the Wolf - strength. Morality emerges from here: just defense is not valid for those who intend to do injustice.
Unlike Aesop, Krylov put the moral of his fable at the beginning, but the development of events in the fable is not perceived as a simple illustration of morality. In Krylov's work, the wolf becomes the embodiment of inexorable evil force, cruelty and willfulness, and the development of the plot before our eyes reveals the mechanism of action of this cruel force. Readers witness everything that happens to the characters.
At the beginning of the fable, the Lamb is not afraid of the Wolf, because he does not harm anyone in any way and does not violate the established rules. The senseless accusations made by the Wolf are easily refuted by the Lamb. There is self-esteem in the Lamb's responses. For a moment, readers even think that the Lamb has driven the Wolf to a dead end, because the predator has no more arguments to accuse. But it does not come out of this at all that after meeting with the Wolf, the Lamb will remain unharmed. Just the opposite. Each decent answer from the Lamb annoys the Wolf even more. Finally, the self-willed predator gets tired of looking for the imaginary guilt of his prey and he shows his essence. The last words of the fable: “The Wolf said - and into the dark forest the Wolf dragged the Lamb” - at the same time expected and unexpected. The reader knew from the very beginning that this should have happened, but, observing the development of events, he hoped that the Lamb would still bring his innocence.
In the fables of Aesop and Krylov, the plot, characters and even morality are common. Aesop's fable is written in prose, and Krylov's in poems. But, in my opinion, the most important thing that distinguishes these two fables is the very reader's perception of the works. Aesop's Fable is an appeal, so to speak, to the mind of the reader. And Krylov's fable - to his heart.
