Methods for assessing competitive applications of municipalities submitted to participate in the nomination "Town-planning policy, providing a favorable environment of the life of the population and the development of housing and communal services" of the All-Russian competition.

7.1. All applications submitted to the Competition are preliminary expertise by the staff of the Agency Regional Representative Office. The term of preliminary examination is 5 business days. In the event that the submitted applications do not comply with the requirements set out in paragraph 6.1 of this Regulation, the application is sent to refinement. The deadline for finalizing the application is 5 working days, but no later than the deadline for the 1st stage of the competition. Regional representative offices of the Agency lead the register of received and rejected applications. According to the results of the examination, the agency's representation to the agency address is sent a general package of applications from the relevant federal district.

7.2. The agency holds a collection, learning and preliminary assessment for further consideration at the meetings of the expert jury.

When evaluating the work, the expert jury is guided by the following primary criteria:

Objective effects achieved from the implementation of the project;

Unique model or approach;

The possibility of using a model or approach in other regions;

Social effect of project implementation.

7.3. The expert jury holds a comprehensive and systematic assessment of the projects received within applications. The assessment is carried out with the aim of competitive selection of the most interesting and significant projects and definitions of the finalists of the competition. At the end of the 3th stage of the competition, the expert jury prepare proposals for 3 finalists in each nomination for further submission to the meeting of the Board of Trustees.

VIII. Summing up the competition

8.1. The Board of Trustees sums up the competition and defines the winners of the competition within the 4th stage of the competition.

8.2. In each of the nominations, one winner is determined. At the same time, the Board of Trustees is entitled to increase the number of winners in each nomination.

8.3. The results of the competition are announced within the Russian Investment Forum (Sochi).

8.4. Following the competition, a library of projects will be formed. According to projects in the finalists of the competition, the agency develops guidelines in the format of "ready-made solutions" for further placement in the Region-ID information system.

8.5. The results of the competition will be covered in the media and profile periodicals.

IX. Other conditions

9.1. In the procedure established by the legislation of the Russian Federation, the Board of Trustees is entitled to terminate the competition at any time before summing up the competition. In this case, the notice of the rejection of all applications for participation in the competition or the termination of the competition is immediately sent by the Agency to all participants in the competition.

9.2. The agency, members of the Board of Trustees and the expert jury are not responsible for the non-receipt by the participant of the Competition of the Information or receipt of incorrect information about the competition, if the competition participant received such information in informal order.

Appendix No. 1.

to CEO

Autonomous non-profit organization

"Strategic Initiatives Agency

to promote new projects "

S.V. Chupsheva

Notification

on participation in the All-Russian Competition

best practices and initiatives of socio-economic development

in the subjects of the Russian Federation

I ask you to organize the consideration of the application __________________________________________________________

(Name of the subject of the Russian Federation)

as part of the All-Russian competition of the best practices and initiatives of socio-economic development in the constituent entities of the Russian Federation.

With the conditions and requirements of the competitive selection, and agree.

For participation, I ask to cooperate with the responsible for the implementation of projects specified in the accompanying summary of projects.

The accuracy of the information presented in the Competition Application guarantee.

Applications: 1) Project passports for ____ l. in 1 copy;

2) Description of projects for ____ l. in 1 copy;

3) presentation of projects on electronic media;

4) confirmation of the description and results of project implementation on ____ l. in 1 copy

Higher official

subject of the Russian Federation ___________

Appendix No. 2.

Project passport

1. Name Practice

3. Prerequisites for implementation

Brief description of the situation that determined the implementation of the practice

Opportunities that have allowed to implement practice:

5. Participants in the Project Implementation of Practice

6. Brief description of the business model for the implementation of practice

8. Regulatory support for practice - what regulatory legal acts have been developed or approved in order for the practice to be implemented.

NAP adopted:

Changed NPA:

9. Belligers (stakeholders): region, entrepreneurs, residents

10. The cost of implementing the project:

Appendix No. 3.

Contact Information

Appendix 3.

Approved

order of the Ministry of Construction

from _____________ 2017 N _______

Methodik

Estimates of competitive applications of municipalities,

Represented to participate in the nomination "Town Planning

Politics, providing a favorable environment of vital activity

Population and development of housing and communal services "

All-Russian Competition "Best Municipal Practice"

1. This methodology determines the procedure for evaluating the competitive applications of municipalities submitted to participate in the nomination "Town-planning policy, providing a favorable environment of the life of the population and the development of housing and communal services" of the All-Russian Competition "Best Municipal Practice" (hereinafter - a competitive application).

2. The assessment of competitive applications is carried out by the Sub-Commission of the Federal Competition Commission for the Organization and Conduct of the All-Russian Competition "Best Municipal Practice" (hereinafter referred to as the Competition) on the nomination "Town-planning policy, ensuring a favorable environment of the life of the population and the development of housing and communal services" (hereinafter - the subcommission).

3. The subcommission assesses competitive applications by assigning points under paragraphs 3 - 11 of section II of a competitive application based on the indicators provided for by the table contained in paragraph 4 of this technique (hereinafter referred to as the table).

4. Indicators are determined by the following:

a) the indicators provided for in paragraphs 1.1 - 1.2, 2.1 - 2.7, 5.1 - 5.16, 11.1 - 11.2 of the table, members of the subcommittee are assigned points in the range indicated in the table, depending on which extent, according to a member of the subcommission, this indicator Apply to the evaluated practice;

b) the indicators provided for in paragraphs 3.1 - 3.3, 3.5 tables are assigned points in accordance with the share of extrabudgetary funds in the total cost of practice (for example, 1% - 0.1; 2% - 0.2; 100% - 1);

c) indicators provided for in paragraphs 3.4, 5.1, 6.1 - 6.3, 7.1 - 7.4, 8.1, 9.2, 12 tables, in the case of a positive response, index 5 is assigned, in the case of negative - 0;

d) the indicators provided for in paragraphs 6.4, 9.1 of the table, in the case of a positive response, an index 10 is assigned, in the case of negative - 0;

e) the indicator provided for in paragraph 10.1 of the table is assigned points in accordance with the share of budget funds in the total cost of practice (up to 50% - 5, 50% or more - 0).

	Name of the indicator	Evaluation in Ballhach
1. A brief description of the situation that necessitated the need to implement practice
	Practice has been implemented in connection with the need to solve a specific, acute problem in the field of urban policy, ensuring a favorable environment of the life of the population or the development of housing and communal services
	Practice is implemented in order to improve the quality of life in the territory of the municipality
2. Problems that should have been solved by the implementation of practice
	Implemented practice was performed to solve the problem or a set of problems typical of a number of Russian municipalities
	Implemented practice ensured a solution to a specific task in the framework of the Municipal Development Strategy
	Implemented practice ensured the solution of the task of better connectivity and transport accessibility of objects and services in the territory of the municipality
	Implemented practice ensured the solution to the problem of population involvement in the decision-making process in the field of urban policy, ensuring a favorable environment of the life of the population or the development of housing and communal services
	Implemented practice ensured the solution to the problem of adaptation to the use of cultural heritage sites
	Implemented practice ensured the improvement of the environmental situation in the territory of the municipality
	Implemented practice ensured the solving problems of small groups of the population
3. Opportunities (resources) that have allowed to implement practice
	Practice is implemented using grants of charitable organizations and / or public organizations, private donations
	Practice is implemented using local community funds
	Practice is implemented with the involvement of citizens (citizens self-defense facilities or a different form)
	Practice is implemented with the involvement of residents as performers
	Practice is implemented with attracting private investment
4. Results of the implementation of practice in measurable values
	The results of the practice of practice are indicated, which are confirmed by the relevant values \u200b\u200bof the indicators provided for in paragraphs 1 - 3, 5 - 8 of this table
5. Economic and / or social effects from the implementation of practice
	The implementation of the practice has the result of the emergence of a sought-after public territory in the municipal formation
	Implementation of the practice results in the result of a decrease in the use of personal road transport in favor of public transport (including taxis)
	The implementation of the practice results in the result of the reduction of the use of personal road transport in favor of the pedestrian movement
	The implementation of the practice has a result of a decrease in energy consumption or other resources in the territory of this municipality while maintaining the quality of life of the population
	The implementation of the practice has the result of the creation of a mechanism for the participation of the population in decision-making in the field of urban-planning policies, ensuring a favorable environment of the life of the population or the development of housing and communal services
	The implementation of the practice results in the preservation or creation of unique objects and spaces, or social, cultural, other practices inherent in this municipal education.
	The implementation of practice results in the increase in the status of a resident of this municipality
	The implementation of the practice has the result of the economy of the budget of the municipality
	Implementation of practice results in an increase in the income of the municipal budget
	The implementation of the practice results in the savings of the personal time of the residents of the municipality
	The implementation of practice results in a result of a decrease in the threat of injuries arising in connection with the functioning of the elements of urban infrastructure, improvement and transport
	The implementation of the practice has the result of improving the health of residents of the municipality
	The implementation of the practice results in the increase in the number of residents of the municipality
	The implementation of practice has the result of the influx of persons visiting the territory of the municipality
	Implementation of the practice results in the emergence of new private enterprises in the provision of services for the public
	The implementation of the practice has the result of occurrence in the territory of the municipal formation of facilities for entrepreneurial activities
6. Beginners
	Direct Recipient Benefits from the implementation of practice is the local government body as an authority that carries out the management of the municipal farm
	Direct recipient benefits from practice is identified by a group of persons (for example, small groups of the population)
	Direct Recipient Benefits from the implementation of practice are persons engaged in entrepreneurial activities in the provision of services to the population
	Direct recipients benefits are all residents of the municipality
7. Participants in the Project Implementation of Practice
	Implemented practice made on the initiative of citizens, public organizations, associations of entrepreneurs
	Implemented practice was performed with the active participation of representatives of the population, public organizations, persons engaged in entrepreneurial activities, in developing a common idea, concepts and practices
	Implemented practice was carried out in the active participation of representatives of the population, public organizations, persons engaged in entrepreneurial activities, in the development of specific design solutions or the choice of design solutions
	Implemented practice was carried out with the active participation of representatives of the population, public organizations, persons engaged in entrepreneurial activities, in the introduction of practice, its implementation
8. Actions to deploy practitioners (a list of activities that were taken to implement the practice)
	Presented a list of events that were taken to implement the practice (roadmap)
9. Legal support for the implementation of practice (municipal legal acts developed or approved for the purpose of implementing practice)
	The implementation of the practice is made without changing the existing methodological and (or) regulatory framework.
	The implementation of the practice was carried out with a change in the existing methodological and (or) regulatory framework by local governments with the participation of representatives of experts, the public and persons engaged in entrepreneurial activities
10. Project Implementation Costs
	Attracting funds from budget system budgets of the Russian Federation to implement practice
11. Measures to improve the implementation of practice - recommendations
	Implemented practice collaborated
	Presentation materials are characterized by visibility and high quality.
	Persons responsible for the implementation of practices in the municipality, ready to ensure consultation of persons interested in the replication of practice

5. The total amount of points on a competitive application is calculated by the formula:

II - the final amount of points on the i-th competitive application;

c is the number of members of the Sub-Commission that raised a competitive application;

The amount of points exhibited by the members of the Subcommission on the application of the Itho Municipality according to subparagraph "A" of paragraph 4 of this technique;

The amount of points exhibited by the members of the subcommission on the application of the I-wow municipality according to subparagraphs "b" - "d" of paragraph 4 of this technique.

6. The municipal formation, the competitive application of which was assigned the largest number of points, is recognized as the winner of the competition.

Order of the Ministry of Construction and Housing and Communal Services of the Russian Federation of April 6, 2017 No. 690 / Pr "On approval of the methodology for assessing competitive applications of municipalities submitted to participate in the nomination" Urban-planning policy, ensuring a favorable environment of the life of the population and the development of housing and communal services " All-Russian Competition "Best Municipal Practice"

In accordance with paragraph 5 of the Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of August 18, 2016 No. 815 "On the All-Russian Competition" Best Municipal Practice "(Meeting of the Legislation of the Russian Federation, 2016, No. 35, Art. 5335) I order:

1. To approve the methodology for assessing the competitive applications of municipalities submitted to participate in the nomination "Urban-planning policy, providing a favorable environment of the life of the population and the development of housing and communal services" of the All-Russian Competition "The Best Municipal Practice" in accordance with this order.

2. Department of the urban environment (O.N. Demchenko) no later than 10 days from the date of signing to send a present order to state registration to the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation.

3. Control over the execution of this order to shall be entrusted to the Deputy Minister of Construction and Housing and Communal Services of the Russian Federation A.V. Chibis.

Minister

MA Men

application

Approved
Ministry of Construction
and housing and communal services
Russian Federation
dated April 6, 2017 № 690 / pr

Methodik
estimates of the competitive applications of municipalities submitted to participate in the nomination "Town-planning policy, ensuring a favorable environment of the life of the population and the development of housing and communal services" All-Russian Competition "Best Municipal Practice"

1. This methodology determines the procedure for evaluating the competitive applications of municipalities submitted to participate in the nomination "Town-planning policy, providing a favorable environment of the life of the population and the development of housing and communal services" of the All-Russian Competition "Best Municipal Practice" (hereinafter - a competitive application).

2. The assessment of competitive applications is carried out by the Sub-Commission of the Federal Competition Commission for the Organization and Conduct of the All-Russian Competition "The Best Municipal Practice" (hereinafter - the Competition) on the nomination "Town-planning policy, providing a favorable environment of the life of the population and the development of housing and communal services" (hereinafter - the Subcommission).

3. The subcommission assesses competitive applications by assigning points under paragraphs 3-11 of section II of the competitive application on the basis of indicators provided for in the table contained in this technique (hereinafter -).

4. Indicators are determined with the following:

a) the indicators provided for by ,,, tables, members of the subcommission are assigned points in the range specified in the table, depending on which extent, according to a member of the subcommission, this indicator applies to the evaluated practice;

b) the indicators provided for, tables are assigned points in accordance with the share of extrabudgetary funds in the total cost of practice (for example, 1% - 0.1; 2% - 0.2; 100% - 1);

c) indicators provided for in ,,,,, tables, in the case of a positive response, an index 5 is assigned, in the case of negative - 0;

d) the indicators provided for in the table, in the case of a positive response, an index 10 is assigned, in the case of negative - 0;

e) the indicator provided for in the table is assigned points in accordance with the share of budget funds in the total cost of practice (up to 50% - 5, 50% or more - 0).

No \\ n	Name of the indicator	Evaluation in Ballhach
1. A brief description of the situation that necessitated the need to implement practice
1.1.	Practice has been implemented in connection with the need to solve a specific, acute problem in the field of urban policy, ensuring a favorable environment of the life of the population or the development of housing and communal services	0-10
1.2.	Practice is implemented in order to improve the quality of life in the territory of the municipality	0-5
2. Problems that should have been solved by the implementation of practice
2.1.	Implemented practice was performed to solve the problem or a set of problems typical of a number of Russian municipalities	0-10
2.2.	Implemented practice ensured a solution to a specific task in the framework of the Municipal Development Strategy	0-5
2.3.	Implemented practice ensured the solution of the task of better connectivity and transport accessibility of objects and services in the territory of the municipality	0-10
2.4.	Implemented practice ensured the solution to the problem of population involvement in the decision-making process in the field of urban policy, ensuring a favorable environment of the life of the population or the development of housing and communal services	0-10
2.5.	Implemented practice ensured the solution to the problem of adaptation to the use of cultural heritage sites	0-5
2.6.	Implemented practice ensured the improvement of the environmental situation in the territory of the municipality	0-10
2.7.	Implemented practice ensured the solving problems of small groups of the population	0-5
3. Opportunities (resources) that have allowed to implement practice
3.1.	Practice is implemented using grants of charitable organizations and / or public organizations, private donations	0-10
3.2.	Practice is implemented using local community funds	0-10
3.3.	Practice is implemented with the involvement of citizens (citizens self-defense facilities or a different form)	0-10
3.4.	Practice is implemented with the involvement of residents as performers	5
3.5.	Practice is implemented with attracting private investment	0-10
4. Results of the implementation of practice in measurable values
4.1.	The results of the practice of practice are indicated, which are confirmed by the relevant values \u200b\u200bof the indicators provided for in this table	5
5. Economic and / or social effects from the implementation of practice
5.1.	The implementation of the practice has the result of the emergence of a sought-after public territory in the municipal formation	0-5
5.2.	Implementation of the practice results in the result of a decrease in the use of personal road transport in favor of public transport (including taxis)	0-5
5.3.	The implementation of the practice results in the result of the reduction of the use of personal road transport in favor of the pedestrian movement	0-10
5.4.	The implementation of the practice has a result of a decrease in energy consumption or other resources in the territory of this municipality while maintaining the quality of life of the population	0-5
5.5.	The implementation of the practice has the result of the creation of a mechanism for the participation of the population in decision-making in the field of urban-planning policies, ensuring a favorable environment of the life of the population or the development of housing and communal services	0-10
5.6.	The implementation of the practice results in the preservation or creation of unique objects and spaces, or social, cultural, other practices inherent in this municipal education.	0-5
5.7.	The implementation of practice results in the increase in the status of a resident of this municipality	0-5
5.8.	The implementation of the practice has the result of the economy of the budget of the municipality	0-5
5.9.	Implementation of practice results in an increase in the income of the municipal budget	0-10
5.10.	The implementation of the practice results in the savings of the personal time of the residents of the municipality	0-10
5.11.	The implementation of practice results in a result of a decrease in the threat of injuries arising in connection with the functioning of the elements of urban infrastructure, improvement and transport	0-10
5.12.	The implementation of the practice has the result of improving the health of residents of the municipality	0-10
5.13.	The implementation of the practice results in the increase in the number of residents of the municipality	0-10
5.14.	The implementation of practice has the result of the influx of persons visiting the territory of the municipality	0-5
5.15.	Implementation of the practice results in the emergence of new private enterprises in the provision of services for the public	0-10
5.16.	The implementation of the practice has the result of occurrence in the territory of the municipal formation of facilities for entrepreneurial activities	0-5
6. Beginners
6.1.	Direct Recipient Benefits from the implementation of practice is the local government body as an authority that carries out the management of the municipal farm	5
6.2.	Direct recipient benefits from practice is identified by a group of persons (for example, small groups of the population)	5
6.3.	Direct Recipient Benefits from the implementation of practice are persons engaged in entrepreneurial activities in the provision of services to the population	5
6.4.	Direct recipients benefits are all residents of the municipality	10
7. Participants in the Project Implementation of Practice
7.1.	Implemented practice made on the initiative of citizens, public organizations, associations of entrepreneurs	5
7.2.	Implemented practice was performed with the active participation of representatives of the population, public organizations, persons engaged in entrepreneurial activities, in developing a common idea, concepts and practices	5
7.3.	Implemented practice was carried out in the active participation of representatives of the population, public organizations, persons engaged in entrepreneurial activities, in the development of specific design solutions or the choice of design solutions	5
7.4.	Implemented practice was carried out in the active participation of representatives of the population, public organizations, persons engaged in entrepreneurial activities in the introduction of practice, its implementation	5
8. Action on the deployment of practice (a list of activities that were taken to implement the practice)
8.1.	Presented a list of events that were taken to implement the practice (roadmap)	5
9. Legal support for the implementation of practice (municipal legal acts developed or approved for the purpose of implementing practice)
9.1.	The implementation of the practice is made without changing the existing methodological and (or) regulatory framework.	10
9.2.	The implementation of the practice was carried out with a change in the existing methodological and (or) regulatory framework by local governments with the participation of representatives of experts, the public and persons engaged in entrepreneurial activities	5
10. Project Implementation Costs
10.1.	Attracting funds from budget system budgets of the Russian Federation to implement practice	0-10
11. Measures to improve the implementation of practice - recommendations
11.1	Implemented practice collaborated	0-10
11.2	Presentation materials are characterized by visibility and high quality.	0-5
12	Persons responsible for the implementation of practices in the municipality, ready to ensure consultation of persons interested in the replication of practice	5

5. The total amount of points on a competitive application is calculated by the formula:

The total amount of points on the i-th competitive application;

c - the number of members of the subcommittee, raising a competitive application;

The amount of points exposed by the members of the Subcommission on the application of the Itho municipality under this technique;

The amount of points exhibited by the members of the Subcommission on the application of the Itho municipality under this technique.

6. The municipal formation, the competitive application of which was assigned the largest number of points, is recognized as the winner of the competition.

Overview of the document

The methodology for assessing competitive applications of municipalities submitted to participate in the nomination "Town-planning policy, ensuring a favorable environment of the life of the population and the development of housing and communal services" of the All-Russian Competition "Best Municipal Practice".

Defined evaluation indicators. The formula for calculating the total amount of the balls on the competitive application is given.

The assessment is carried out by the Sub-Commission of the Federal Competition Commission for the Organization and Conduct of the All-Russian Competition "Best Municipal Practice" on the above nomination.