Methodology for evaluating competitive applications of municipalities submitted for participation in the nomination "Urban planning policy, ensuring a favorable living environment for the population and the development of housing and communal services" All-Russian competition.

Appendix 3

Approved

by order of the Ministry of Construction

dated _____________ 2017 N _______

METHOD

EVALUATION OF COMPETITIVE APPLICATIONS OF MUNICIPAL EDUCATIONS,

SUBMITTED FOR PARTICIPATION IN THE NOMINATION "URBAN PLANNING

POLICY, ENSURING ENVIRONMENTAL ENVIRONMENT

POPULATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNAL SERVICES "

ALL-RUSSIAN COMPETITION "BEST MUNICIPAL PRACTICE"

1. This Methodology determines the procedure for evaluating competitive applications of municipalities submitted for participation in the nomination "Urban planning policy, ensuring a favorable living environment for the population and the development of housing and communal services" of the All-Russian competition "Best municipal practice" (hereinafter referred to as the competitive application).

2. Evaluation of competitive applications is carried out by a subcommittee of the federal competition commission for organizing and holding the All-Russian competition "Best municipal practice" (hereinafter referred to as the competition) in the nomination "Urban planning policy, ensuring a favorable living environment for the population and the development of housing and communal services" (hereinafter referred to as the Subcommittee).

3. The subcommittee evaluates the bids by assigning points to items 3 - 11 of section II of the bid on the basis of the indicators provided for in the Table contained in clause 4 of this Methodology (hereinafter referred to as the Table).

4. Indicators are determined taking into account the following:

a) the indicators provided for in paragraphs 1.1 - 1.2, 2.1 - 2.7, 5.1 - 5.16, 11.1 - 11.2 of the Table, the members of the Subcommittee assign points in the range indicated in the Table, depending on the degree to which, in the opinion of the member of the Subcommittee, this indicator applicable to the assessed practice;

b) the indicators provided for in clauses 3.1 - 3.3, 3.5 of the Table are assigned points in accordance with the share of extrabudgetary funds in the total cost of the practice (for example, 1% - 0.1; 2% - 0.2; 100% - 1);

c) the indicators provided for in clauses 3.4, 5.1, 6.1 - 6.3, 7.1 - 7.4, 8.1, 9.2, 12 of the Table, in case of a positive answer, an index of 5 is assigned, in case of a negative - 0;

d) the indicators provided for in clauses 6.4, 9.1 of the Table, in the case of a positive answer, an index of 10 is assigned, in the case of a negative - 0;

e) the indicator provided for in paragraph 10.1 of the Table is assigned points in accordance with the share of budget funds in the total cost of practice (up to 50% - 5, 50% and more - 0).

	Indicator name	Score in points
1. Brief description of the situation that necessitated the implementation of the practice
	The practice was implemented in connection with the need to solve a specific, acute problem in the field of urban planning policy, to ensure a favorable living environment for the population or the development of housing and communal services
	The practice was implemented in order to improve the quality of life in the territory of the municipality
2. Problems that had to be solved by the implementation of the practice
	The implemented practice was carried out with the aim of solving a problem or a set of problems typical for a number of Russian municipalities
	The implemented practice provided a solution to a specific problem within the framework of the development strategy of the municipality
	The implemented practice provided a solution to the problem of better connectivity and transport accessibility of objects and services on the territory of the municipality
	The implemented practice provided a solution to the problem of involving the population in the decision-making process in the field of urban planning policy, ensuring a favorable living environment for the population or the development of housing and communal services
	The implemented practice provided a solution to the problem of adaptation to the use of cultural heritage objects
	The implemented practice ensured an improvement in the environmental situation in the territory of the municipality
	The implemented practice provided a solution to the problems of people with limited mobility
3. Opportunities (resources) that made it possible to implement the practice
	The practice was implemented using grants from charitable organizations and / or funds of public organizations, private donations
	The practice was implemented using funds from local community foundations
	The practice was implemented with the involvement of citizens' funds (self-taxation means of citizens or another form)
	The practice was implemented with the involvement of residents as work performers
	The practice was implemented with the involvement of private investments
4. Results of the implementation of the practice in measurable terms
	The results of the implementation of the practice are indicated, which are confirmed by the corresponding values ​​of the indicators provided for in paragraphs 1 - 3, 5 - 8 of this Table
5. Economic and / or social effects from the implementation of the practice
	The implementation of the practice results in the emergence of a demanded public territory in the municipality.
	The implementation of the practice results in a decrease in the use of personal road transport in favor of public transport (including taxis)
	The implementation of the practice results in a decrease in the use of personal vehicles in favor of pedestrian traffic
	The implementation of the practice results in a decrease in the consumption of energy or other resources in the territory of a given municipality while maintaining the quality of life of the population.
	The implementation of the practice results in the creation of a mechanism for the participation of the population in decision-making in the field of urban planning policy, ensuring a favorable living environment for the population or the development of housing and communal services.
	The implementation of the practice results in the preservation or creation of unique objects and spaces, or social, cultural, and other practices inherent only to this municipality.
	The implementation of the practice results in an increase in the status of a resident of this municipality.
	The implementation of the practice results in savings in the budget of the municipality
	The implementation of the practice results in an increase in municipal budget revenues
	The implementation of the practice results in saving the personal time of residents of the municipality
	The implementation of the practice results in a decrease in the threat of injuries arising in connection with the functioning of elements of urban infrastructure, landscaping and transport
	The implementation of the practice results in improving the health of residents of the municipality
	The implementation of the practice results in an increase in the number of residents of the municipality
	The implementation of the practice results in an influx of people visiting the territory of the municipality
	The implementation of the practice results in the emergence of new private enterprises in the field of providing services to the population
	The implementation of the practice results in the emergence of objects on the territory of the municipality for carrying out entrepreneurial activities
6. Beneficiaries
	The direct recipient of the benefits from the implementation of the practice is the local self-government body as the body that manages the municipal economy
	The direct recipient of the benefits from the implementation of the practice is an identifiable group of people (for example, people with limited mobility)
	The direct recipient of the benefits from the implementation of the practice are persons engaged in entrepreneurial activities in the provision of services to the public.
	All residents of the municipality are direct beneficiaries
7. Participants of the project implementation practice
	The implemented practice was carried out at the initiative of citizens, public organizations, business associations
	The implemented practice was carried out with the active participation of representatives of the population, public organizations, persons engaged in entrepreneurial activities in the development of a common idea, concept and practice
	The implemented practice was carried out with the active participation of representatives of the population, public organizations, persons engaged in entrepreneurial activities in the development of specific design solutions or the choice of design solutions
	The implemented practice was carried out with the active participation of representatives of the population, public organizations, persons engaged in entrepreneurial activities, in the implementation of the practice, its implementation
8. Actions to deploy the practice (list of activities that were taken in order to implement the practice)
	A list of activities that have been taken in order to implement the practice is presented (roadmap)
9. Legal support for the implementation of the practice (municipal legal acts developed or approved for the purpose of implementing the practice)
	The practice was implemented without changing the existing methodological and (or) regulatory framework
	The implementation of the practice was carried out with a change in the existing methodological and (or) regulatory framework by local authorities with the participation of representatives of experts, the public and persons engaged in entrepreneurial activities
10. Project implementation costs
	Attraction of funds from the budgets of the budgetary system of the Russian Federation for the implementation of practice
11. Measures to Improve Implementation of Practice - Recommendations
	The implemented practice is replicated
	Presentation materials are clear and high quality
	Persons responsible for the implementation of the practice in the municipality, ready to provide advice to persons interested in replicating the practice

5. The total amount of points for the competitive application is calculated according to the formula:

Ii - the total amount of points for the i-th competitive application;

c - the number of members of the subcommittee who rated the bid;

The amount of points awarded by members of the subcommittee at the request of the i-th municipal formation under subparagraph "a" of paragraph 4 of this Methodology;

The sum of points given by members of the subcommittee at the request of the i-th municipal formation under subparagraphs "b" - "e" of paragraph 4 of this Methodology.

6. The municipal entity, the competition application of which was awarded the highest number of points, is recognized as the winner of the competition.

7.1. All applications submitted for the Competition undergo a preliminary examination by the employees of the Agency's regional representative office. The term for the preliminary examination is 5 working days. If the submitted applications do not meet the requirements set forth in clause 6.1 of these Regulations, the Application is sent for revision. The deadline for finalizing the application is 5 working days, but no later than the date of the 1st stage of the Competition. Regional offices of the Agency keep a register of received and rejected applications. Based on the results of the examination, the Agency's Representative Office sends a general package of applications from the relevant federal district to the Agency.

7.2. The agency collects, studies and pre-evaluates for further consideration at the meetings of the Expert Jury.

When evaluating works, the Expert Jury is guided by the following main criteria:

Objective achieved effects from the implementation of the Project;

The uniqueness of the model or approach;

Possibility of using the model or approach in other regions;

Social effect from the implementation of the Project.

7.3. The expert jury conducts a comprehensive and systematic assessment of the Projects received within the framework of applications. Evaluation is carried out with the aim of competitive selection of the most interesting and significant Projects and determination of the finalists of the competition. At the end of the 3rd stage of the Competition, the Expert Jury prepares proposals for 3 finalists in each nomination for further submission to the meeting of the Board of Trustees.

VIII. Summing up the results of the Competition

8.1. The Board of Trustees sums up the results of the Competition and determines the winners of the Competition within the 4th stage of the Competition.

8.2. One winner is determined in each of the nominations. At the same time, the Board of Trustees has the right to increase the number of winners in each nomination.

8.3. The results of the Contest are announced within the framework of the Russian Investment Forum (Sochi).

8.4. Based on the results of the Competition, a library of Projects will be formed. For the projects to the finalists of the Competition, the Agency develops methodological recommendations in the format of “Ready-made solutions” for further placement in the information system “Region-ID”.

8.5. The results of the Contest will be covered in the media and specialized periodicals.

IX. Other conditions

9.1. In accordance with the procedure established by the legislation of the Russian Federation, the Board of Trustees has the right to terminate the Competition at any time before the results of the Competition are summed up. In this case, a notice of rejection of all applications for participation in the Competition or of termination of the Competition is immediately sent by the Agency to all participants in the Competition.

9.2. The Agency, members of the Board of Trustees and the Expert Jury are not responsible for non-receipt by the participant of the Competition of information or receipt of incorrect information about the Competition, if the participant of the Competition received such information unofficially.

Appendix # 1

to CEO

Autonomous non-profit organization

"Agency for Strategic Initiatives

to promote new projects "

S.V. Chupsheva

Notification

on participation in the All-Russian competition

best practices and initiatives for socio-economic development

in the constituent entities of the Russian Federation

I ask you to organize the consideration of the application ______________________________________________________________

(name of the subject of the Russian Federation)

within the framework of the All-Russian competition of the best practices and initiatives of socio-economic development in the constituent entities of the Russian Federation.

I have read and agree with the conditions and requirements of the competitive selection.

For participation, please interact with those responsible for the implementation of the Projects, indicated in the attached summary of Projects.

I guarantee the accuracy of the information provided in the tender application.

Attachments: 1) Passports of Projects for ____ l. in 1 copy;

2) a description of the Projects on ____ pages. in 1 copy;

3) presentation of Projects on electronic media;

4) confirmation of the description and results of the implementation of the Projects on ____ pages. in 1 copy.

Top official

subject of the Russian Federation ___________

Appendix No. 2

Project Passport

1. Name of practice

3. Prerequisites for implementation

Brief description of the situation that led to the implementation of the practice

Opportunities that made it possible to implement the practice:

5. Participants of the project implementation of the practice

6. Brief description of the business model for the implementation of the practice

8. Regulatory support for the implementation of the practice - what regulatory legal acts were developed or approved in order for the practice to be implemented.

Adopted legal acts:

Changed laws and regulations:

9. Beneficiaries (stakeholders): region, entrepreneurs, residents

10. Project implementation costs:

Appendix No. 3

Contact Information

Order of the Ministry of Construction and Housing and Utilities of the Russian Federation No. 690 / pr dated April 6, 2017 "On Approval of the Methodology for Evaluating Competitive Applications of Municipalities Submitted for Participation in the Category" Urban Development Policy, Ensuring a Favorable Living Environment for the Population and Development of Housing and Utilities Sector " All-Russian competition "Best municipal practice"

In accordance with clause 5 of the Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of August 18, 2016 No. 815 "On the All-Russian competition" The Best Municipal Practice "(Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation, 2016, No. 35, Art. 5335) I order:

1. To approve the methodology for evaluating the competitive applications of municipalities submitted for participation in the nomination "Urban planning policy, ensuring a favorable living environment for the population and the development of housing and communal services" of the All-Russian competition "Best municipal practice" in accordance with this order.

2. The Department of Urban Environment (ON Demchenko), no later than 10 days from the date of signing, send this order for state registration to the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation.

3. Control over the execution of this order shall be entrusted to the Deputy Minister of Construction and Housing and Communal Services of the Russian Federation A.V. Lapwing.

The minister

M.A. Men

Application

APPROVED BY
Ministry of Construction
and housing and communal services
Russian Federation
dated April 6, 2017 No. 690 / pr

Methodology
evaluation of competitive applications of municipalities submitted for participation in the nomination "Urban planning policy, ensuring a favorable living environment for the population and the development of housing and communal services" of the All-Russian competition "Best municipal practice"

1. This Methodology determines the procedure for evaluating competitive applications of municipalities submitted for participation in the nomination "Urban planning policy, ensuring a favorable living environment for the population and the development of housing and communal services" of the All-Russian competition "Best municipal practice" (hereinafter referred to as the competitive application).

2. Evaluation of competitive applications is carried out by a subcommittee of the federal competition commission for organizing and holding the All-Russian competition "Best municipal practice" (hereinafter referred to as the competition) in the nomination "Urban planning policy, ensuring a favorable living environment for the population and the development of housing and communal services" (hereinafter referred to as the Subcommittee).

3. The subcommittee evaluates the bids by assigning points to items 3-11 of section II of the bid on the basis of the indicators provided by the Table contained in this Methodology (hereinafter -).

4. Indicators are determined taking into account the following:

a) the indicators provided for,,, Tables, by the members of the Sub-Commission are assigned points in the range indicated in the Table, depending on the extent to which, in the opinion of the member of the Sub-Commission, this indicator is applicable to the assessed practice;

b) the indicators provided for in the Tables are assigned points in accordance with the share of extra-budgetary funds in the total cost of the practice (for example, 1% - 0.1; 2% - 0.2; 100% - 1);

c) the indicators provided for,,,,,, Tables, in case of a positive answer, an index of 5 is assigned, in case of a negative - 0;

d) the indicators provided for in the Table, in the case of a positive answer, is assigned an index of 10, in the case of a negative - 0;

e) the indicator provided for in the Table is assigned points in accordance with the share of budgetary funds in the total cost of practice (up to 50% - 5, 50% and more - 0).

No. p \ p	Indicator name	Score in points
1. Brief description of the situation that necessitated the implementation of the practice
1.1.	The practice was implemented in connection with the need to solve a specific, acute problem in the field of urban planning policy, to ensure a favorable living environment for the population or the development of housing and communal services	0-10
1.2.	The practice was implemented in order to improve the quality of life in the territory of the municipality	0-5
2. Problems that had to be solved by the implementation of the practice
2.1.	The implemented practice was carried out with the aim of solving a problem or a set of problems typical for a number of Russian municipalities	0-10
2.2.	The implemented practice provided a solution to a specific problem within the framework of the development strategy of the municipality	0-5
2.3.	The implemented practice provided a solution to the problem of better connectivity and transport accessibility of facilities and services on the territory of the municipality	0-10
2.4.	The implemented practice provided a solution to the problem of involving the population in the decision-making process in the field of urban planning policy, ensuring a favorable living environment for the population or the development of housing and communal services	0-10
2.5.	The implemented practice provided a solution to the problem of adaptation to the use of cultural heritage objects	0-5
2.6.	The implemented practice ensured an improvement in the environmental situation in the territory of the municipality	0-10
2.7.	The implemented practice provided a solution to the problems of people with limited mobility	0-5
3. Opportunities (resources) that made it possible to implement the practice
3.1.	The practice was implemented using grants from charitable organizations and / or funds of public organizations, private donations	0-10
3.2.	The practice was implemented using funds from local community foundations	0-10
3.3.	The practice was implemented with the involvement of citizens' funds (self-taxation means of citizens or another form)	0-10
3.4.	The practice was implemented with the involvement of residents as work performers	5
3.5.	The practice was implemented with the involvement of private investments	0-10
4. The results of the implementation of the practice in measurable terms
4.1.	The results of the implementation of the practice are indicated, which are confirmed by the corresponding values ​​of the indicators provided for in this Table	5
5. Economic and / or social effects from the implementation of the practice
5.1.	The implementation of the practice results in the emergence of a demanded public territory in the municipality.	0-5
5.2.	The implementation of the practice results in a decrease in the use of personal road transport in favor of public transport (including taxis)	0-5
5.3.	The implementation of the practice results in a decrease in the use of personal vehicles in favor of pedestrian traffic	0-10
5.4.	The implementation of the practice results in a decrease in the consumption of energy or other resources in the territory of a given municipality while maintaining the quality of life of the population.	0-5
5.5.	The implementation of the practice results in the creation of a mechanism for the participation of the population in decision-making in the field of urban planning policy, ensuring a favorable living environment for the population or the development of housing and communal services.	0-10
5.6.	The implementation of the practice results in the preservation or creation of unique objects and spaces, or social, cultural, and other practices inherent only to this municipality.	0-5
5.7.	The implementation of the practice results in an increase in the status of a resident of this municipality.	0-5
5.8.	The implementation of the practice results in savings in the budget of the municipality	0-5
5.9.	The implementation of the practice results in an increase in municipal budget revenues	0-10
5.10.	The implementation of the practice results in saving the personal time of residents of the municipality	0-10
5.11.	The implementation of the practice results in a decrease in the threat of injuries arising in connection with the functioning of elements of urban infrastructure, landscaping and transport	0-10
5.12.	The implementation of the practice results in improving the health of residents of the municipality	0-10
5.13.	The implementation of the practice results in an increase in the number of residents of the municipality	0-10
5.14.	The implementation of the practice results in an influx of people visiting the territory of the municipality	0-5
5.15.	The implementation of the practice results in the emergence of new private enterprises in the field of providing services to the population.	0-10
5.16.	The implementation of the practice results in the emergence on the territory of the municipality of objects for carrying out entrepreneurial activities	0-5
6. Beneficiaries
6.1.	The direct recipient of the benefits from the implementation of the practice is the local self-government body as the body that manages the municipal economy.	5
6.2.	The direct recipient of the benefits from the implementation of the practice is an identifiable group of people (for example, people with limited mobility)	5
6.3.	The direct recipient of the benefits from the implementation of the practice are persons engaged in entrepreneurial activities in the field of providing services to the population	5
6.4.	All residents of the municipality are direct beneficiaries	10
7. Participants of the project implementation practice
7.1.	The implemented practice was carried out at the initiative of citizens, public organizations, business associations	5
7.2.	The implemented practice was carried out with the active participation of representatives of the population, public organizations, persons engaged in entrepreneurial activities, in the development of a common idea, concept and practice	5
7.3.	The implemented practice was carried out with the active participation of representatives of the population, public organizations, persons engaged in entrepreneurial activities in the development of specific design solutions or the choice of design solutions	5
7.4.	The implemented practice was carried out with the active participation of representatives of the population, public organizations, persons engaged in entrepreneurial activities, in the implementation of the practice, its implementation	5
8. Actions to deploy the practice (list of activities that have been taken in order to implement the practice)
8.1.	A list of activities that have been taken in order to implement the practice is presented (roadmap)	5
9. Legal support for the implementation of the practice (municipal legal acts developed or approved for the purpose of implementing the practice)
9.1.	The practice was implemented without changing the existing methodological and (or) regulatory framework	10
9.2.	The implementation of the practice was carried out with a change in the existing methodological and (or) regulatory framework by local authorities with the participation of representatives of experts, the public and persons engaged in entrepreneurial activities	5
10. Project implementation costs
10.1.	Attraction of funds from the budgets of the budgetary system of the Russian Federation for the implementation of practice	0-10
11. Measures to Improve Implementation of Practice - Recommendations
11.1	The implemented practice is replicated	0-10
11.2	Presentation materials are clear and high quality	0-5
12	Persons responsible for the implementation of the practice in the municipality, ready to provide advice to persons interested in replicating the practice	5

5. The total amount of points for the competitive application is calculated according to the formula:

The total amount of points for the i-th competitive application;

с - the number of members of the subcommittee who rated the bid;

The amount of points awarded by members of the subcommittee at the request of the i-th municipal formation according to this Methodology;

The sum of points given by members of the subcommittee at the request of the i-th municipal formation according to this Methodology.

6. The municipal entity, the competition application of which was awarded the highest number of points, is recognized as the winner of the competition.

Document overview

The methodology for evaluating the bids of municipalities submitted for participation in the nomination "Urban planning policy, ensuring a favorable living environment for the population and the development of housing and communal services" of the All-Russian competition "Best municipal practice" was approved.

Assessment indicators have been determined. The formula for calculating the total amount of points for a competitive application is given.

The assessment is carried out by a subcommittee of the Federal Competition Commission for the organization and conduct of the All-Russian Competition "Best Municipal Practice" in the above nomination.